Search results for query: *

I picked 5 guys who played 6 games in total between them and those 5 answers scored 2.2 in total in an overall score of 3.7. Top result scored 1.7 total from his 9 answers. How tf do people do it

Still good to know, thanks so much

The number is one of the old Melbourne numbers which is a digit short and “Clubknit” doesn’t seem to exist these days. Ended up finding this tonight though which makes me think these jumpers were something anyone could buy despite this ad just detailing VFL clubs Would still appreciate you...

Not sure where to ask this question, but I found this in an op shop today and thought it was interesting enough to grab I’m pretty confident it’s an official VFL knit although the gold crest under the logo seems unusual. Does anyone know if this could be a sweater for VFL employees or is this...

Not sure what got Dan upset here

Jack Graham - 26 votes Players in the 25-26 vote band Cotchin - 26 votes Trent played one less game than Graham and Jack still couldn’t outpoll this champion geriatric in 2023 Hopper - 25 votes Jacob played 5 less games than Graham, and was extremely disappointing when he did play bar maybe 2...

Which part of this 2018 season would he have been leading our BnF as an “inside bull”? A single game of over 20 disposals over 23 games. Before you think that you’re thinking of another season, you aren’t, each season of his career is pretty similar.

Maybe Dimma will offer up a 3rd rounder for him

Graham is a chocolate frying pan

We’ve basically played a player down in our forwardline all season because has been absolutely no genuine danger for any kind of consistent scoreboard impact. Not a single trick up his sleeve.

Great point

Glad we cleared it up

You got confused then. I’m saying we don’t owe him a place in the side based on something he did 4 years ago which is what the post I was replying to said.

Are you seriously suggesting players should be picked on “loyalty” grounds rather than output? Because, no, that actually doesn’t win you flags.

Oh boy, yeah nah, accepting mediocre form because someone did something brave 4 years ago isn’t going to fly if we wanna be successful again. He’s been well remunerated, and he won a 2nd flag in 2020. We don’t owe him anything, he doesn’t owe us anything, move on man

How’s the conditions lads

Quizmania - 2006-7ish Late night call in quiz show which should be forgettable but I loved watching it for all the weird people that would call in. Some A+ cringe Gogs - 2000-ish Weird claymation kids show. Probably inappropriate nowadays for kids

after today I’ve warmed to the idea of the next test being rained out and us winning 2-1 It’s been so fun

And look at the bargaining chip you’ve gained for the rest of his life for all future negotiations!

Any dees supporters have a mate they want to dob in tonight?

🤢

You aren't understanding what I'm saying. No one gives a flying duck about Jack Grahams win percentage. He is not playing well, he needs to be a lot better than he is.

“He averages mid-teens possessions as a fat, slow inside mid that can’t actually play inside mid, but gee, look at his 66% personal win percentage, it’s the most important thing in football” “We’d accept your first rounder and that Zak Butters with his pathetic 63% win ratio” You’re having an...

You’re right, so the win percentage crap means absolutely nothing like I was saying.

Remember “no Deledio no Richmond”? We couldn’t win games without Lids playing. Won 3 of the next 4 flags without him. Biggest waste of time stat I’ve seen to justify the s**t Graham pumps out each week rather than anything actually useful.

Xbox news was within 7 days of last Friday, so probs still a couple of days to go.

“List clogger” = absolutely agree “Could have got a 1st rounder for him a couple years ago” = you’re smoking crack. Absolute best case for him has always been 2nd round. “$600k salary” = you’re smoking crack again

Because aside from a couple accidental 25-30 touch games playing in the middle he will predominately punch out about 15 touches 97% of the time.