Search results for query: *

Geez all the sooking over the fixture. Every club has 11 Home games. Some have them interstate or overseas for extra cash, that's the clubs choice. Victorian teams usually play an interstate team away 6 times a year, get over it. They can't play all interstate teams away it just doesn't work...

Exactly. They're all professional athletes that people pay money to go and watch. They're entitled to cheer and boo whoever they want.

Racism is RACISM. There is no difference.

Yet Hawks fans would be contradicting your theory by cheering for Hill & Cyril.

It does exist, just like it does the other way.

Erin said the same thing. I posted it earlier. It seems that is their belief.

Should forward that screen grab onto Fairfax media or yet someone at News Corp that would write against them. Be hilarious seeing them suffer their own medicine with an 'outraged opinion article.'

Naw thanks for caring buddy, what are you worried about?

I would like to know how she had Internet access at the G. I can't use any internet when there is 45,000+ there. I like accessing live stats but can't.

I had a quick look and without counting them, yeah she spends more time complaining on her phone then watching the game.

Just click on their profile and scroll. Not that hard. Took me 2 seconds. I thought I would check their pages out because they were being discussed earlier on in this thread.

Don't worry guys, The Footy isn't their only issue. A Musical at the Theater is outrageous to them. :rolleyes:

No credibility = people who fill their twitter page up with garbage like this.

You just go through their twitter account and you can tell they have no creditability.

Which part? What's sexist and racist about it?

Her article couldn't get any more poorly written. If any journalist writes an opinion piece as bad as that they should expect some criticism. The only thing Erin heard was this; This is what outraged her at the Football and a friend of hers heard the alleged racist remarks. Calling Goodes a...

The media believes Ports form from the start of the year is back, based on a flogging of Carlton. I watched only snippets of the game but there was no pressure.

Looks fine to me.

You can quite clearly see the difference when they use it. Even when we play the bombers in it.

I know there is a lot of discussion on ideas on what changer from here on but why? Richmond has been using it's clash jumper since 2010 and played Port Adelaide in it last year with no issues. There was also no issue playing West Coast in their normal jumper with white shorts. I have no idea...

I think you'll find the roof policy will change for next season. The AFL has started to get some hearing. After all they have admitted defeat on Sunday and Monday night time slots, even though just about everyone complained about them before the first one was played.