Norm De Guerre
Left of the dial.
Veteran
10k Posts
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2021
Western Bulldogs - Ed Richards Player Sponsor 2021
Western Bulldogs - Ed Richards 2019 Player Sponsor
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale 2019 Player Sponsor
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2018
- Mar 27, 2004
- 11,903
- 35,578
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Australian Farnarkling XI
The question shouldn't really be discussed in the absolutes that it currently is.
Was he brought to the club as a CHB? Yes
Did we switch him forward because of a dearth of KPF? Yes
Has that switch been a success? Yes.
Do we need a CHB? yes.
Was his less than half a game in defence a decisive answer one way or the other? No.
Could we do with his manic pressure in defence? Yes.
Does the club consider their current KPD stocks adequate? Yes.
Did one fall into our laps this year? maybe.
Can we afford to send him back as it stands? No.
Will Darcy be the catalyst for forcing this change? Maybe.
Should we be factoring in Croft? Maybe.
Naughton may well see himself as a KPF (my preference) but much will depend on where we see Darcy and perhaps Croft playing over the next 12-24 months. It's pretty obvious that Darcy is shaping as a true unicorn, but in typical fashion he's been used at both ends of the ground with a view to rounding out his game. We have no idea where he will end up playing but I see him as an English analogue. Likely to subsume Lobbs role in time. Given he looks pretty comfortable anywhere on the ground the club may see him otherwise. Croft assuming he's comes to us our plans for him are completely unknown.
However, I wouldn't be surprised if he is earmarked for the Naughton treatment only in reverse.
One thing is an absolute. Naughton, JUH, Lobb, Darcy and potentially Croft cannot all fit into the same forward half.
Somebody is going to be turned into a defender and the only one (excluding Lobb) from the above that we can confidently rule out is JUH.
So....maybe.
I hope that cleared things up for youse!
/thread.
Was he brought to the club as a CHB? Yes
Did we switch him forward because of a dearth of KPF? Yes
Has that switch been a success? Yes.
Do we need a CHB? yes.
Was his less than half a game in defence a decisive answer one way or the other? No.
Could we do with his manic pressure in defence? Yes.
Does the club consider their current KPD stocks adequate? Yes.
Did one fall into our laps this year? maybe.
Can we afford to send him back as it stands? No.
Will Darcy be the catalyst for forcing this change? Maybe.
Should we be factoring in Croft? Maybe.
Naughton may well see himself as a KPF (my preference) but much will depend on where we see Darcy and perhaps Croft playing over the next 12-24 months. It's pretty obvious that Darcy is shaping as a true unicorn, but in typical fashion he's been used at both ends of the ground with a view to rounding out his game. We have no idea where he will end up playing but I see him as an English analogue. Likely to subsume Lobbs role in time. Given he looks pretty comfortable anywhere on the ground the club may see him otherwise. Croft assuming he's comes to us our plans for him are completely unknown.
However, I wouldn't be surprised if he is earmarked for the Naughton treatment only in reverse.
One thing is an absolute. Naughton, JUH, Lobb, Darcy and potentially Croft cannot all fit into the same forward half.
Somebody is going to be turned into a defender and the only one (excluding Lobb) from the above that we can confidently rule out is JUH.
So....maybe.
I hope that cleared things up for youse!
/thread.