Australian Cricket Thread - No.3 🏏

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

England continue to prove what a ******* shambles they are.
Have no idea how to pick another opener.
Lyth looks like someone who is lost and has no clue how to find his way back home.
To the English selectors, Lyth represents the opener that Compton, Carberry, Robson, Root and Trott weren’t. I’m not sure what they think an English opener represents.
Along with Ballance and Bell, they form the top order tail of England.

It's not all doom and gloom though. At least Anderson took a hat trick. Three innings in a row without a wicket. Oh wait... Guess it is!
Broad is the only bowler they have that scares Australia, even then, it doesn't scare them much.
Wood can't be the best 3rd bowler England have. Where are they looking?

In three Test series in a row, the English have led 1-0. In three Test series in a row, the score quickly became 1-1.

England all out on day 4 in 37 overs. That’s 5 more overs than they lasted in Sydney. That was only three Ashes Tests ago.
 
We don't need Nevill to be serious about retaining the Ashes. We could carry Haddin too and still win comfortably.

I do agree though, Nevill should be in.
Haddin is past it with the bat. Hasn't shown much since that 2013 series where he saved our arses time and time again. These days, his batting average isn't that much higher than Lyons. True story!
 
Been hearing he is alright, so Buck should be there.

England already making a mess of their lineup, bringing in Bairstow for Ballance. What type of dumb s**t decision is this?

Just look at this for stupidity!
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1437561251.576047.jpg
Are they trying to lose by day 3 instead of 4?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top