- May 6, 2007
- 39,830
- 23,488
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
This is what givesme hope against the Eagles this week. Bring pressure and a bit of luck and who knows if the Eagles are ripe for the picking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is a work in progress . I would not say all the drive is coming from midfielders. The fact we have changed to a more intercept style back six has an impact. All of our defenders are intercept players so it is important that the midfield defends through the middle. People are also under estimating how much effect having Redman back at 100% and in good form.Big change from the last few years is that now our drive from half back is coming from hard working midfielders instead of our halfbacks.
Means if we turn it over we still have 6 or 7 back instead of 4 or 5.
It is a work in progress . I would not say all the drive is coming from midfielders. The fact we have changed to a more intercept style back six has an impact. All of our defenders are intercept players so it is important that the midfield defends through the middle. People are also under estimating how much effect having Redman back at 100% and in good form.
Anything you see as key to us taking the next step that we would want to see develop over the remainder of this year?
Buy in and teaching being clear is the most crucial part now.
It's so...weird watching an Essendon team that has gears and can possess the footy when there isn't an opening to just run it down the field.The biggest win for me has been our extra marking power around the ground. At the start of the year I was wondering where it would come from but Cox and Jones have given us a lot along with all the back 6 who can take a decent grab and even Phillips is chipping in with 3 or 4 marks up the ground at important times. It allows you to control the game by either going quick with the hands off or slowing the game down when needed.
It isn't gambling when you can rely on the other 20 guys on the team doing their job.
Peak Hawthorn did the same - structure up, work hard and when you choose to scrap the ball forward odds are someone will be in a position to capitalise.
It looks like luck because other teams scrap it forward for lack of other options and then aren't in a position to benefit. The difference is what's happening off the ball.
There's a lot of Richmond in the team defence high pressure stuff. Apparently the forward handball is a Gia from Bulldogs thing?Even still, people say we are Richmond lite...I don't see the similarity, Richmond surge in number, we still use a give and go handball after a 45 kick to sling foward, sure we have more handball options thru the middle but it's not a surge, it's generally pre stationed zonal players
It isn't gambling when you can rely on the other 20 guys on the team doing their job.
It's why I described it as educated gambling. It takes the typical midfield head to head match ups involving guys like Matt Crouch and Tom Mitchell where they are 'on' each other but basically just chase the ball around and pay no attention to anyone else a step further. If your man wins the ball your recourse is praying that they miss. Martin is the king of this which is why it looks like he's always bobbing up like a sprinkler head in his own paddock.
Trying not to get sucked in to the contest is counterintuitive which is why it's so hard, having said that everything about Richmond is counterintuitive which is probably why no one has really solved for X yet.
It's probably why they lose they tend to get beaten pretty comprehensively, the whole thing is a highly functioning house of cards
How viable that is is another question though, given they demand players structure up in different ways. Bulldogs players move for the outlet, Tigers (outside the attacking exceptions) move to maintain pressure on the ball.Combining the Richmond off-the-ball movement, with the Bulldogs with-the-ball movement, is a solid setup imo. The Dogs in close, by hand, are absolutely elite. Richmond's ability to generate turnovers via pressure, and having players be in just the right spot, is elite.
The changeover in personnel means that perhaps they're not quite as good at it as they once were, the new player is slightly slower / less fit / less experienced so can't execute for as long. Injuries catch up to senior guys. Motivation wanes a little.
Their top-end talent is still talented, their system still fundamentally works, their role players still play their roles. So they'll be thereabouts.
How viable that is is another question though, given they demand players structure up in different ways. Bulldogs players move for the outlet, Tigers (outside the attacking exceptions) move to maintain pressure on the ball.
That helps. Sides can not kick 8 goals in a row if you actually hit one of your forwards and he kicks a goalI still think it’s kick ball through big posts. Killer game plan that one.
It’s such a beautiful simple game. I take it that over a season, 17 ”game plans “ don’t work, and one “game plan” does. Paralysis by over analysis. Watch any game and it’s kick and dump, kick it and hope for the best, 95% of the time.That helps. Sides can not kick 8 goals in a row if you actually hit one of your forwards and he kicks a goal