its only a game
Rookie
Tigers up and about should be a big granny it has been a long time since these 2 sides have meet GO RUSHY
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steven (?) Reeves will be coaching Murchison as a non-playing coach in season 2012, I don't know a lot about him, or his style (All that I know is that he's from Shepparton East, and I think he may have coached Ardmona for a bit, if anyone can fill me in on this, I would appreciate that), but it's reassuring that we've got a new coach this early, usually we fart arse around too much, but at least we can plan ahead for this season.
We'll need to because there could be some big outs for us if the rumours are true (I won't tell you here, but anyone who's got thier ear to the ground knows who I'm refering too).
Tigers up and about should be a big granny it has been a long time since these 2 sides have meet GO RUSHY
2004 from memory if your talking GF's, the last time rushy won a flag, obviously after seeing the Tigers close up yesterday there is nothing that changes my mind that Lancy will get rolled next week. We didnt take our chances early and had opportunities to have scoreboard pressure on Rushy going in at half-time but bad kicking is bad footy. We were again on top early in the 3rd but still couldnt convert and then the floodgates opened, as soon as the game opened up their leg speed and run and carry highlighted our lack of leg speed and by 3/4 time we were out on our feet.
An influx of 3 or 4 teenagers will help with the leg speed next year and that elusive Full Forward will be on top of the shopping list in the coming months.
Chris Eddy got the week at the tribunal, would assume they'd go to appeal, interesting to see if they get the appeal up before the GF. Surely he would be available to play if they cant hear it next week. Highlights the VCFL ruling that states if your found guilty you must get a minimum of a week, there is no doubt the tribunal would have only given him a reprimand if they were able to do so.
Hank, so interesting to see or more like hear what a few of your diehard supporters thought of you after the game in social rooms. Fair to say they aren't to impressed with both your actions on the ground and off, seems as though there feed up with you posting everything single detail that happens at your club so hence why I laughed when I opened up bigfooty today and sure your last post. Get a life and worry
Bout getting a kick then gobbling of again. Well that was the word of the diehard supporters that I won't name given there status as club legends.
Great win by rushy going to be a ripper next week, rushy will serve it right up to lanky, trav perry is the x factor, great bloke and super footballer... Rushy to win by 12 points.
Wasn't the GVFL part of a VCFL trial where by a player could get a reprimand.???
Hank, so interesting to see or more like hear what a few of your diehard supporters thought of you after the game in social rooms. Fair to say they aren't to impressed with both your actions on the ground and off, seems as though there feed up with you posting everything single detail that happens at your club so hence why I laughed when I opened up bigfooty today and sure your last post. Get a life and worry
Bout getting a kick then gobbling of again. Well that was the word of the diehard supporters that I won't name given there status as club legends.
Great win by rushy going to be a ripper next week, rushy will serve it right up to lanky, trav perry is the x factor, great bloke and super footballer... Rushy to win by 12 points.
Is it possible Joe that he is the father of ( Mitchell ), who played in thr premiership winning , SE thirds side ?
I wonder if he will pull the boots on one final time, still looks super fit and with several players leaving he may be a handy inclusion to the hoppers. Wonder how my old mate Bodzy pulled up today, was a fair singalong happening in the pool house at 3 this morning and he belts out a fair tune too..welcome aboard weagle 22How interesting Steve is coaching Murch, from all accounts he has coached Junior sides for the past 15 years with the exception of SE Seconds for a couple. Will be interesting to see if he step up to the mark since he hasn't played seniors for a number of years and is now non playing. There is a big difference between success in a 4ths side compared to seniors! Although Steve has mentioned he has 6 GV blokes signed, and for the sake of Murch one would hope some of his big talk is true, it could be a good year for them.. if he can pull through that is. All the best for Murch, they may need it! Look forward to seeing how they come up next year, could be interesting!
You can only appeal with new evidence and you have to sit out until the appeal is heard.
Where abouts is the GF being played at?
Is played at Mooroopna,i think it will suit Rushworth big ground and they spread well. Can see Lanky being in front at half time and Rushworth running home the better to win .
Seniors : Rushworth 4 goals(as stated above)
Medal : Drew Clarke
Reserves : Lancaster 2 goals (purely cause Stanhope won it last year)
Medal : Brady Cooper
Thirds : Tally ( surely can't lose )
Medal : Would'nt have a clue,someone from Tally.
Good luck to everyone involved on the weekend !!!
Are both Rushy and Lancy at full strength? (I know Pryde is overseas, but any others) Rushy looked good Satdy, ran the ball well and had too many options up forward for Stanhope to stop. Will be a good game.
Stanhope 2s looked good also, had a couple of kids who ran like the wind. Were they full strength or is there ins now that the seniors are out?
It's an interesting point every year is most leagues I think Hank and varies from league to league PDFL is 4 club games and no more than 9 senior games , 1 bloke qualified for finals by playing ( or being named on the teamsheet ) for the reserves and seniors 2 weeks in a row therefore playing 4 club games ??Rushy are at full strength, Lancy's only query will be Eddy pending an appeal.
Stanhope 2s will be a different side as there was 5 running around Satdy that played 9 or 10 senior games throughout the year which now means they are ineligible to play with the seniors out, there is another 5 that are eligible to slot back in from the seniors but only a couple will do so I'd say.
This was brought up last year but surely the rule needs to be looked at as to eligibility. We have a couple of players who have played 9 senior games and 11 reserves games but find themselves ineligible to play but we could play a couple that have played 8 senior games and not one reserves game.
For those that dont know the criteria;
to be eligible for the reserves finals you must have played atleast 3 club games at any level, but no more than 8 senior games. ( you do not have to play a reserves game to qualify)
Rushy are at full strength, Lancy's only query will be Eddy pending an appeal.
Stanhope 2s will be a different side as there was 5 running around Satdy that played 9 or 10 senior games throughout the year which now means they are ineligible to play with the seniors out, there is another 5 that are eligible to slot back in from the seniors but only a couple will do so I'd say.
This was brought up last year but surely the rule needs to be looked at as to eligibility. We have a couple of players who have played 9 senior games and 11 reserves games but find themselves ineligible to play but we could play a couple that have played 8 senior games and not one reserves game.
For those that dont know the criteria;
to be eligible for the reserves finals you must have played atleast 3 club games at any level, but no more than 8 senior games. ( you do not have to play a reserves game to qualify)
If lancy lose a ruck and CHF, they are hard to replace, not sure any side could cover that sort of loss. Still think they have a superior midfield and forward line but. The big guy for Rushy was good in the ruck last week and Lancy would be hoping that he doesnt play another like that.
Not a fan of the qualifications either Hank. If you play more reserves than seniors, surely that should be enough. On the other hand, if you dont play a reserves game for the year and play 8 seniors, then that shouldnt entitle you to a reserves game. (Hate to be the bloke missing a game for the player also.)
It needs to be changed to the same as GV, you must play 6 or more games in the 2s in the year to play in the 2s finals.
You are correct on the first but in error on the second. Let's face it, tripping and attempted tripping are on the sheet, why would you go again without new evidence. On the second, check Rule 8.8.1 - you do the time. Of course you can go cap in hand and shed a tear under 8.8.2 or 8.8.3 but the Appeal Board reserves the right to VARY the penalty if it chooses not to uphold the appeal and that can mean more weeks. Even if it is upheld, the build up to a Grand Final combined with the knowledge that $2500 was just spent on you adds to the pressure to perform!wrong and wrong
You are correct on the first but in error on the second. Let's face it, tripping and attempted tripping are on the sheet, why would you go again without new evidence. On the second, check Rule 8.8.1 - you do the time. Of course you can go cap in hand and shed a tear under 8.8.2 or 8.8.3 but the Appeal Board reserves the right to VARY the penalty if it chooses not to uphold the appeal and that can mean more weeks. Even if it is upheld, the build up to a Grand Final combined with the knowledge that $2500 was just spent on you adds to the pressure to perform!
You are correct on the first but in error on the second. Let's face it, tripping and attempted tripping are on the sheet, why would you go again without new evidence. On the second, check Rule 8.8.1 - you do the time. Of course you can go cap in hand and shed a tear under 8.8.2 or 8.8.3 but the Appeal Board reserves the right to VARY the penalty if it chooses not to uphold the appeal and that can mean more weeks. Even if it is upheld, the build up to a Grand Final combined with the knowledge that $2500 was just spent on you adds to the pressure to perform!
Joe, you would'nt be to concerned about losing these 3 would you?? 37yo who has been shopping himself around like a "Turner" since midway through the year and handballs as much as one also. 35yo who is surely past his prime with injuries starting to take there toll, best game he played at Murch was the 06 Granny and a 33yo on one leg whose idea of a Tues session dose'nt involve a football. Anyhow it would free up the $$ for Reever to pay the 6 un-named GV senior players he is spruiking about. Good luck to the Lumberjack and Fuzman, can't say i'll be cheering out loud whilst the maroon and gold is being worn though.