I'd rather a club legend as coach that took a finals making team and pushed them further out of the finals each year, too Schraderbrau.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It works the other way as well though.
If you sign the wrong guy and the club shows no progress in the next 2 seasons then when you sack him the damage is compounded because you've just wasted another two seasons. As a frontier club, if Brisbane are in the same position in two years as they are now it's a catastrophe. A hell of a risk to take on a coach who was so far done little to justify his appointment (it was a strange appointment in the first place given his limited experience imo).
What they should of done is given a commitment to him that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given it's highly unlikely that they have the same run of injuries as 2015 and that there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Leppisch can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.
Yeah because signing a coach with 7 years assistant coaching experience at two different clubs is much worse than signing a coach with 2 years experience at one single club (where he played almost his whole career). Lets not even mention that that particular coach has shown that he has no concept of how the game of snakes and ladders works, let alone coaching.
Or trying to go up the ladders and down the snakes.Boom. Killshot.
Schraderbrau will sue you for restraint of troll now.
Yeah because signing a coach with 7 years assistant coaching experience at two different clubs is much worse than signing a coach with 2 years experience at one single club (where he played almost his whole career). Lets not even mention that that particular coach has shown that he has no concept of how the game of snakes and ladders works, let alone coaching.
Assistant coach at two struggling bottom 8 clubs is not good coaching experience. Anyway that was like 1/8th of my post. The rest of it makes a bit of sense imo (and is hardly unfair to Leppitsch).Boom. Killshot.
Schraderbrau will sue you for restraint of troll now.
Yes but that was the part where you were trolling. Hence the responses you received. See, your modus operandi is fairly obvious. It is the source of great amusement that you think you're getting away with it unnoticed.Anyway that was like 1/8th of my post.
I deleted it, and fwiw I'll be pissed if we re-sign Buckley before the end of the season (unless it's clear we make the 8). Even though the clubs have different list profiles, similar thinking ought to apply to both of them imo. Re-signing early makes no sense.Yes but that was the part where you were trolling. Hence the responses you received. See, your modus operandi is fairly obvious. It is the source of great amusement that you think you're getting away with it unnoticed.
Lions played finals when Leppa was assistant, and Richmond has been 9th, in an 18 team comp, for years. Your maths is s**t.Assistant coach at two struggling bottom 8 clubs is not good coaching experience. Anyway that was like 1/8th of my post. The rest of it makes a bit of sense imo (and is hardly unfair to Leppitsch).
It works the other way as well though.
If you sign the wrong guy and the club shows no progress in the next 2 seasons then when you sack him the damage is compounded because you've just wasted another two seasons. As a frontier club, if Brisbane are in the same position in two years as they are now it's a catastrophe. A hell of a risk to take on a coach who was so far done little to justify his appointment.
A hell of a risk to take on a coach who was so far done little to justify his appointment (it was a strange appointment in the first place given his limited experience imo).
What they should of done is given a commitment to him that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given it's highly unlikely that they have the same run of injuries as 2015 and that there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Leppisch can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.
Yeah the limited experience was my mistake in wording. I was more referring to experience at top clubs. Imo it should be one of the key criteria when appointing a first timer coach and I can't think of too many current coaches who haven't had that experience. Anyway it's now irrelevant, I don't know why I brought it up and I've already copped a pasting for it.What do you expect in two years, after a slew of retirements, injuries and players going home? In the two years since he was appointed as coach, he and his team have rebuilt the list with 34 changes to the playing list he inherited from Michael Voss. The GH5 were leaving as Leppitsch arrived, while he has overseen the retirement of fellow premiership players Jonathan Brown, Simon Black and Ash McGrath, as well as retiring Brent Staker, Matt Maguire and Luke McGuane. Not to mention other players that didn't make the grade which is common to all clubs. In Leppitsch's time as coach, its' possibly only Redden and Aish that the Lions would have liked to retain. in 2016, 15 players remain from 2013, the year before Leppitsch took over.
Please. Limited experience?
Justin Leppitsch's experience as an assistant coach
2007 Brisbane - 10th - 9 wins
2008 Brisbane - 10th - 10 wins
2009 Brisbane - 6th - 14 wins (2 finals)
2010 Richmond - 15th - 6 wins
2011 Richmond - 12th - 8 wins
2012 Richmond - 12th - 10 wins
2013 Richmond - 7th - 15 wins (1 final)
How long should he serve a coaching apprenticeship? Seven years not enough?
Disagree completely. Leppitsch deserves a bit of security after taking the needed steps to rebuild the list from what he inherited. There was no way he was going to win too many games in 2014. Last years over the top injury list made the situation even worse and gave the impression that no progress has been made in the careers of many players. Whether forced or not, the games that have been invested in the Lions' younger players will stand the club in good stead in the coming years.
A one year coaching appointment where Leppitsch can finally look to improve the youngest list in the AFL, that he and his recruiting team has put together is not long enough. Lists capable of playing finals often take years to build. Bottom line is that Leppitsch deserves another two years to advance the list he has built. He needs it. The players need it, the club needs it. I personally would have given him to the end of 2018, but the club in its wisdom has decided to the end of 2017.
Why do we have a Collingwood fan telling us about how much of a risk Leppa is when he has Buckley as the coach of his club and he has done nothing but take the richest club in the AFL backwards?
Boom. Killshot.
Schraderbrau will sue you for restraint of troll now.
I think I view your playing list more positively than you do. With all players on the park you've got a top 8 midfield that's got scope for improvement given the age of most of them. That's a terrific core to build around and on it's own gives you a significant head start on your rebuild compared to clubs like Carlton and St Kilda who both have bottomed out badly.
You also did very well in last years draft - at worst Schache is a very useful goalkicker, Keays is ready made and I think Hipwood is going to be a gun. In that context, asking for improvement on the 2015 season (where you were decimated by injury) is a very modest goal imo.
You make a decent point about giving him and the players confidence but I think ultimately when you weight it all up, giving him a one year contract with some really modest goals is greater than a 2 year contract with no conditions.
Royboys4eva I agree with your analysis. I would like to comment on one point in particular the overall strength of our coaching panel. I commented on the weakness of our coaching group in another thread and some posters took it to mean our coaching group lacked mental strength. This is not what I meant.
We need additional assistant coaches with skills and proven experience in developing young players. I have no problems with the individual assistants, but as a group I don't think it has the same depth as other clubs. As in the example above we should be trying to pick up assistants from successful clubs. While things have improved from when it appeared Vossy was doing everything himself, it is another area where I think we lack resources.
Schraderbrau said:What they should of done is given a commitment to him that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given it's highly unlikely that they have the same run of injuries as 2015 and that there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Leppisch can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.
jeez you set yourself up for a fail going to another teams board and lecturing them about their coaching position if you own teams coach is also out of contract...Just read that Collingwood are about to give Buckley a 1 year extension.
That's awkward for a certain poster.
What they should have done us give a commitment to Buckley that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given the statistical improbability that Buckley could possibly take the team further down the ladder 5 years straight given there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Buckley can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.
FTFY.jeez you set yourself up for a fail going to another teams board and lecturing them abouttheir coaching position if you own teams coach is also out of contract...anything when you're a Colliwobble supporter.
Just read that Collingwood are about to give Buckley a 1 year extension.
That's awkward for a certain poster.
What they should have done us give a commitment to Buckley that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given the statistical improbability that Buckley could possibly take the team further down the ladder 5 years straight given there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Buckley can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.
Completely agree with this, it's funny how similar they are. The crazy thing is that apparently we wanted to give him two years and he knocked it back. My take on Buckley's position as coach is very similar to that of Leppitsch - you get a new contract if you demonstrate improvement on the last season. For Buckley that is making the 8 imo.Just read that Collingwood are about to give Buckley a 1 year extension.
That's awkward for a certain poster.
What they should have done us give a commitment to Buckley that they will re-sign him at the end of the season providing the team has shown signs of improvement. This isn't an overly difficult objective given the statistical improbability that Buckley could possibly take the team further down the ladder 5 years straight given there is still a decent level of talent on the list.
If Buckley can't get improvements in 2016 with this list then by the end of the season there is a pretty compelling case that can be made to sponsors/supporter base for moving him on which would mitigate the instability that would normally accompany the removal of a coach. It would also be the least damaging way of moving on a club legend as coach - firing them mid contract is never fun and polarizes the supporter base.