tesla1962
Premiership Player
Rule number 1, Hird lied all the way thru
Rule number 2, Dank is evasive and talks half truths
So Hird lied about the tip off?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rule number 1, Hird lied all the way thru
Rule number 2, Dank is evasive and talks half truths
Yeah, because the club knew well in advance. They put a suppression order on journos in late 2012.So Hird lied about the tip off?
So Demetriou lied and not Hird?Yeah, because the club knew well in advance. They put a suppression order on journos in late 2012.
It wasn't a tip off. It was a reminder that everyone knew.
I don't doubt porkies were told by everyone in the name of appearances.So Demetriou lied and not Hird?
So you believe what he said originally in a voluntary candid interview but not his correction...righto.I don't forget the full story , I just don't believe it was an error. He only corrected the story the day after and had already been caught red handed
So everyone liedI don't doubt porkies were told by everyone in the name of appearances.
If one was unkind, maybe one could say that the first mistake was getting involved with one during his playing days?What mistakes did Hird make regarding drug dealers?
They lied when convenient. It tends to happen in life. In football, lying is the second language.So everyone lied
Did everyone lie all the time or just some of the time
Can you see how ridiculous you sound
Naive? I know people lie as well as tell the truth and it isn't always easy to know whichThey lied when convenient. It tends to happen in life. In football, lying is the second language.
You dont know how naive you sound.
He started off with a lie: 'I take full responsibility' then said he didnt mean it.Naive? I know people lie as well as tell the truth and it isn't always easy to know which
You, on the other hand seem to know that Hird always lies and the others lie when it's convenient
Just so happens that their truth telling coincides with your view
That's worse than naive it's delusional lol
So you believe what he said originally in a voluntary candid interview but not his correction...righto.
I am not going to continue with this - you remind me of Jon Ralph the other night on twitterHe started off with a lie: 'I take full responsibility' then said he didnt mean it.
And has continued with lies: 'I cant wait for the truth to come out' and then goes to court to prevent it.
How about this one: 'We cant be sure what the players were given' but then contradicted by Little saying the club was sure the players werent given anything banned. Someone is lying there, maybe Hird, maybe Little.
I dont get his tweets, I tweeted him one Saturday morning about how the Off the Bench Team were tearing him a new one about him criticising the Age going to a tabloid format and he got all precious and blocked me.I am not going to continue with this - you remind me of Jon Ralph the other night on twitter
As you were Fu
It's a prescription drug.
It needs a prescription.Melatonin is not a banned substance, which is what Weap told him it was.
Lot of YOUR money don the drain for such a non event. Why bother?Not sure what the fuss is about tomorrow. If ASADA win Essendon will still fight the SC's and a reasonable case will still need to be made against the players where punishments are quite likely to be light anyway. If Essendon win ASADA will still reissue notices. It's a bit of a non event IMO
there is a problem. The players dont appear to believe they were given TB4, so how can the confess to something they arent aware of?If so, then everyone has a problem. The players were but a phone call away from finding out from ASADA if someone came at them with a TB4 syringe.
They will do anything to prevent lawsuits. Notice the parties taking action.... not the players.Lot of YOUR money don the drain for such a non event. Why bother?
not sure. hopefully they know something i dontLot of YOUR money don the drain for such a non event. Why bother?
Did any of them take the vial and walk to the phone?there is a problem. The players dont appear to believe they were given TB4, so how can the confess to something they arent aware of?
They agreed to it. What do they want? The 2013 finals to be replayed?So now it seems Essendon folk want an EGM - NOT to bring the club to task... but to take the AFL to court to overturn the Deed of Settlement
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/b57bvm8ny6f2qob/AACLpzsaml0dBJRvLkNj0Rtfa/Essendon EGM 180914.pdf?dl=0
2. Deed of Settlement
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
That the Club institute legal proceedings before a Court of competent jurisdiction to
have the Deed of Settlement executed by the Club and the AFL on or about 27
August 2013 declared void or voidable, and to pursue all remedies and
compensation available to the Club in connection therewith.
how would that have helped if the vials werent labelled? why would the have even questioned it when theyd already been told they were only to be given wada compliant substances? why would club staff give them a different substance to what they were told?Did any of them take the vial and walk to the phone?