mmm Sat: Shifter adds to debate
- Thread starter sportz1
- Start date
- Tagged users None
the big vee
Debutant
thats complete stupidity from a pretty experienced man in this caper hell be lucky for top 10
Nothing stupid about it at all.
I would be suprised if he slipped outside of the top 10.
What is it about him that you don't rate for him to be a top 10 pick?
Wizard
Brownlow Medallist
Look for Port to snap him up if Nic Nat is gone by the time they pick.
the big vee
Debutant
He did nothing to impress me at championships other then the stat that says hes 200 cm tall ..Maybe saying that he wont go top 10 was wrong but in my opinion i wouldnt take him in the top 10 at all but im sure some clubs will be looking for a tall guy they can work with a bit.Definately number 1 pick is rediculous thats my opinion though.
That's what I'm hearing too.
I don't think he will be a #1 pick either but he certainly has a lot going for him and i don't know how he couldn't of impressed you in the champs.
What more could he possibly of done.
Anyway, each to their own.
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
I have been saying he is top 5 for a while 
I really rate him.
I really rate him.
- Banned
- #10
1. Watts - Demons
2. Rich/Naitanui - Eagles
3. Naitanui/Rich - Dockers
4. Vickery - Port
5. Hurley - Essendon
6. Hartlett/Ziebell - Carlton
That would be sweet.
Richmond might be a tad annoyed if Vickery is snapped up early.
They need a young ruckman to replace Simmonds more than they need an inside midfielder IMO.
Win-win if Vickery goes to Port...
Would the Bombers be interested in Vickery?
There isn't alot of love for Laycock on their board.
Wizard
Brownlow Medallist
1. Watts - Demons
2. Rich/Naitanui - Eagles
3. Naitanui/Rich - Dockers
4. Vickery - Port
5. Hurley - Essendon
6. Hartlett/Ziebell - Carlton
That would be sweet.
Richmond might be a tad annoyed if Vickery is snapped up early.
They need a young ruckman to replace Simmonds more than they need an inside midfielder IMO.
Win-win if Vickery goes to Port...
Would the Bombers be interested in Vickery?
There isn't alot of love for Laycock on their board.
Sounds about right. Aslong as West Coast take big Nic Nat.
ericpascoe
All Australian
Sounds about right. Aslong as West Coast take big Nic Nat.
We probably will.
And you guys will get Watts.
Rich will go #1.
Wizard
Brownlow Medallist
Doubt very much we would take Watts.
Just on Rich, i just watched a bit of the game from the Under 18's championships. **** hes lazy, when eh deosnt have the footy he couldnt care less about whats happening around him.
1. Watts - Demons
2. Rich/Naitanui - Eagles
3. Naitanui/Rich - Dockers
4. Vickery - Port
5. Hurley - Essendon
6. Hartlett/Ziebell - Carlton
That would be sweet.
Richmond might be a tad annoyed if Vickery is snapped up early.
They need a young ruckman to replace Simmonds more than they need an inside midfielder IMO.
Win-win if Vickery goes to Port...
Would the Bombers be interested in Vickery?
There isn't alot of love for Laycock on their board.
now what if vickery Did go #1 as shifter suggested .That would very interesting
Vickery #1 melb
Watts #2 west coast
Nata #3 Freo
rich #4 Port
Hurley #5 Essendon
ziebell #6 Carlton/ brisbane
Hartlett #7 Carlton /brisbane
Geez and i wonder who im backing in judgement. A guy that probably has over 20 inside links(conservative at best) to AFL clubs or ur opinion. Hmmmmmmmm
The Royal Sampler
Floreat Pica, Bitch!
Wasn't it Shifter who said that the three chances for the #1 pick were Watts/Naitanui/Ziebell? Or was that McConnell?
Everyone seems to think Essendong will go for Hurley, I expect we will take a mid, we've already got quite a few key position options. I wouldn't be dissapointed if we took Hurley, but we have a distinct lack of class in our midfield and Hartlett in particular would help fill that void.
For the record I instinctively make this hilarious typo all the time. When you're typing quickly it just feels like a G should go on the end.
It all depends on how we rate the existing players and the players themselves. We definitely have a Key defender spot open post Fletcher. Is Pears tall enough to fill this hole? Could Hooker fill the hole if he bulks up? Should we use Gumbleton down back? Can we pick up another prospect later or in the trade period? How do we rate our young midfielders? Who do we rate higher Hartlett or Hurley?
All I can say is I am glad I don't have to make the choice.
- Nov 28, 2006
- 28,819
- 11,845
- AFL Club
- Essendon
If Melbourne were smart they'd take Rich.
