
Okay I have been on holidays on a very nice tropical island for the last week which has been great but internet is very restricted. I will be here another week or so so I might not be on much to answer any questions. When I get back though I will field the ones I can.
The usual disclaimer – I do not get to see a whole lot of these kids and am often to make judgements on small snippets. That is sometimes unfair and often make cause me to be fairly divergent from others who may have seen more of the particular kids. I also tend to base quite a lot of my opinion on Champs form. Some people think this is a poor reflection of some guys because often the kids are played out of position or pick up taggers for the first time. Personally I like it because you see how the kids perform in adverse conditions and adapt. Also it is good to see how the TAC players step up against teams with more talent across the board then they face week in week out in the TAC.
Overall I think this might be the hardest year I have been associated mocked on. I am never close but this year I think I will be further from the money than ever. The first 15 or so are pretty clear cut but from there the talent level is very even. I think there are probably 120 or more guys with legitimate chances of being taken in the national draft and I could easily see a team falling in love with any of them and taking them in the second round.
A few key things about my draft:
A few general observations:
· The top of this draft is definitely affected by the guys taken by the GC last year but there will still be some elite players taken in the top 15. The difference is that there is more risk of those guys flopping than usual.
· This year’s crop might be the strongest marking group I have seen. There are a lot of very good marks this year.
· The handballing skills of this group are relatively poor compared with most years. As always there are exceptions.
· The medium distance flat laser kick is not a skill very prevalent this year.
· This is a good year if you are after an inside mid and are prepared to expend a first round pick on one. Outside mids will be very hit and miss although a lot of the usual outside mids might be playing as HBFers. The half back flanker crop is strong and deep. The standard of small forwards is poor and I wouldn’t be spending a high pick on any of the U18 prospects.
· There are a couple of reasonable KP prospects available early but overall the quality of this year’s KP crop is pretty poor. With the forwards there are a few prospects I like a bit later in the draft but even then they have injury issues associated with them. If you miss out on the top 2 defenders you are picking guys with very big question marks over them even if they are capable of playing the position.
· I like 4 rucks in this draft quite a lot but after that I would be waiting for the rookie draft or taking a mature aged player.
Alright on with the show.
The usual disclaimer – I do not get to see a whole lot of these kids and am often to make judgements on small snippets. That is sometimes unfair and often make cause me to be fairly divergent from others who may have seen more of the particular kids. I also tend to base quite a lot of my opinion on Champs form. Some people think this is a poor reflection of some guys because often the kids are played out of position or pick up taggers for the first time. Personally I like it because you see how the kids perform in adverse conditions and adapt. Also it is good to see how the TAC players step up against teams with more talent across the board then they face week in week out in the TAC.
Overall I think this might be the hardest year I have been associated mocked on. I am never close but this year I think I will be further from the money than ever. The first 15 or so are pretty clear cut but from there the talent level is very even. I think there are probably 120 or more guys with legitimate chances of being taken in the national draft and I could easily see a team falling in love with any of them and taking them in the second round.
A few key things about my draft:
- My aim is not to pick players where they are likely to go in the real thing.
- My aim is to pick players based on how good they will be in 3 years for mids and 5 years for talls.
- I do try to give teams players who will suit them and so I may move some guys up or down in my ratings if they suit a particular team eg see Bennell.
- I will be wrong on how high I rate a player and it doesn’t worry me. I apologise to anyone I have been overly harsh on.
- When in doubt I will side against the Victorians. I think there is a lot of pro-Victorian bias on BF, in the media and even with club recruiters. I am doing my own little bit to redress the balance.
- I aim to make people think and deliberately throw some smokies in there and drop others. Despite some of you thinking I am being ridiculous I do rate the people where I have them.
- I have not forgotten anyone. Its simply that I do rate the likes of Barden, Michie etc as high as you. Get over it.
- You might notice this year I have put in returns in my reviews. The whinging of some of the EDT guys finally made an impression – and I also finished a little ahead of usual and have a bit of time to edit.
A few general observations:
· The top of this draft is definitely affected by the guys taken by the GC last year but there will still be some elite players taken in the top 15. The difference is that there is more risk of those guys flopping than usual.
· This year’s crop might be the strongest marking group I have seen. There are a lot of very good marks this year.
· The handballing skills of this group are relatively poor compared with most years. As always there are exceptions.
· The medium distance flat laser kick is not a skill very prevalent this year.
· This is a good year if you are after an inside mid and are prepared to expend a first round pick on one. Outside mids will be very hit and miss although a lot of the usual outside mids might be playing as HBFers. The half back flanker crop is strong and deep. The standard of small forwards is poor and I wouldn’t be spending a high pick on any of the U18 prospects.
· There are a couple of reasonable KP prospects available early but overall the quality of this year’s KP crop is pretty poor. With the forwards there are a few prospects I like a bit later in the draft but even then they have injury issues associated with them. If you miss out on the top 2 defenders you are picking guys with very big question marks over them even if they are capable of playing the position.
· I like 4 rucks in this draft quite a lot but after that I would be waiting for the rookie draft or taking a mature aged player.
Alright on with the show.