Things in life you just don't understand - cricket edition

Remove this Banner Ad

People laying into White and Henriques need to remember that eith out resting over half our team, they wouldn't even be close to the side.
White's likely to replace Clarke in the WC squad if he doesn't get up. His domestic form over the last couple of years has been fantastic.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The thing is that you haven't really provided any context to back up your opinion. Having aura and swagger doesn't stop you from getting dismissed.

Context:
- Old age: Viv's batting was about the same throughout the end of his career, he didn't have a drop due to extreme old age like Wally Hammond or George Headley;
- Injury: not really a factor;
- Pitches: played in the modern age so not really a factor, unlike old blokes like WG Grace;
- Opposition: faced some good opposition, but not really better or worse than a lot of the greats.

I have provided plenty of context - Viv's aura is undoubtedly based on his domination during his first 44 tests, especially where he smashed England to pieces. It certainly isn't based on the remainder of his career, where he averaged 43 from 76 tests.
Pitches were most definitely a factor. There is a lot more science going in to preparing pitches these days, and they are generally far more favourable to batsmen.

Bats are a very big factor. Particularly for someone of Viv's more cavalier style. Whether he would have become reckless, as many modern batsmen do, had he had access to modern bats is another question. If so, his average would probably not have changed by much. If he had played in his same way, but with better bats, his average would increase - I would expect considerably so, but that is clearly only speculation.

Viv had with the bat what Warne had with the ball. The opposition could feel beaten before play even started.

To put him with Bradman is crazy. To put him alongside Tendulkar or Ponting, not so much. He was the standout batsmen of his era.
 
Plus batting in the twilight period is considered difficult. There is also the dew factor so the ball won't come onto the bat as fast, although you could consider this to be countered by bowlers struggling to get a decent grip on the ball.
 
Something I don't understand, why is Sean Abbott described as an All rounder?

anyone that shows a little bit of extra talent in addition to their main skill is considered an all-rounder these days, since we don't differentiate into "batting all-rounders" and "bowling all-rounders".
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

How Ravi Bopara keeps getting a game for England
Has he ever done anything with the bat or ball ?

I don't mind RaviBop but given it's rare to see him bowl more than 2-3 overs nowadays along with him throwing away his wicket like few others despite actually being able to bat it is hard to see why they keep picking him.
 
Jason Behrendorff
Travis Head
Ryan Carters
Gurinder Sandhu
Pete Handscomb

all of a similar age bracket have done more than Abbott

And all have played too many first class matches except for possibly Sandhu and Sandhu's first class performances are worse than Abbotts
 
Head & Behrendorff have played less games.

How is 16 more than 20 and 27?

Especially since Abbott would have played less than 10 at the start of the qualifying period whilst Behrendorff and Head would have played more than ten and were thus not eligible for the award?
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top