It's definitely irritating, and you could argue that it's changing the object of the sentence from the possessions to the number. Don't quote me though.Is that grammatically incorrect or just irritating?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's definitely irritating, and you could argue that it's changing the object of the sentence from the possessions to the number. Don't quote me though.Is that grammatically incorrect or just irritating?
It's definitely irritating, and you could argue that it's changing the object of the sentence from the possessions to the number. Don't quote me though.
I asked you not to quote me!I could not work it out myself but compared to some of the grammar butchering that goes around he is quite precise in his use of English. Don't know if its just me but he even sounds smarter than the average Push Up King
I asked you not to quote me!
Agree though, I like Lucas. Just that habit grinds my gears.
My pet hate is 'excetra'. 9 out of 10 people seem to do it though.Brother we are of one mind. My pet hate is "for all intensive purposes" and "boom recruit"
My pet hate is 'excetra'. 9 out of 10 people seem to do it though.
Classic call from Bluey McKenna on granstand Saturday after West Coast beat the Pies. The other commentator was mentioning how for a brief period before Fremantle play, West Coast would be on top of the ladder. The conversation went something like, "They will have a view from the top of the mountain tonight, at least for a little while", to which Bluey replied, "yes, they'll certainly have ice on their nose".
It's funny when someone who never listens to anything footy-related gets in my car on a weekend and hears a couple of minutes of footy radio.
A lot them have no idea how much the language is butchered on air.
It's like, "what the HELL did that guy just say?!!"!!" Even the 'low-level' blunders, such as "I seen" or "he done it" get a big reaction
This one from Matthew Richardson wasn't really a slip-up, but I thought it was kinda funny:
"I tell ya, one thing I can't do is two things at once"
Yeah, poor Spud's a shocker, but a good guy. He stills says "point in case", even though Barrett has corrected him a few times."Should have went" is one that Danny Frawley, in particular, uses a lot.
Ha ha. TrueThat is like a Captain Bloodism
Reminds with Eddie in Freo vs geelong this year. IIRC it was Mayne (Was actually Mundy) kicks it... Mark taken by Mayne!I can remember Dwayne Russell doing that last year when he kept calling Jack Macrae 'Shaun Higgins'. Higgins gets the ball and kicks it long to... And there was silence for about 3-4 seconds as his brain tried to process the fact that he may have got something wrong and will have to admit it. No instead he just missed the next passage of play hoping that no one would pick up he got Jack Macrae wrong for the 10th time in the call.
"Should have went" is one that Danny Frawley, in particular, uses a lot.
sam newman used to correct him on that very error all the time
BT: "was he caught up in the vortext of the game?"
Spud pronounced "genre" as "john-ray": "I think I've found my john-ray"