johncitizen
Cancelled
Subscription needed. Can someone please copy and paste this story to here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Subscription needed. Can someone please copy and paste this story to here.
The Collingwood Football Club has always been one of the most stable clubs in the AFL.
Craig McRae’s appointment makes him just the 18th Magpies coach in 125 seasons (including Robert Harvey).
In the same time Carlton has had 31 coaches, Essendon 28 and Melbourne 31.
Collingwood generally sticks by its coach and supports him, giving him every opportunity to produce the coveted premiership. Leigh Matthews coached for nine years from 1986 and won a premiership in 1990. Tony Shaw led for four years, myself for 12 years with a premiership, and Nathan Buckley for more than nine years.
Presidents too have lasted the journey. Since 1980 the Pies have had six club bosses including current day, Mark Korda.
Even general managers have been few and far between.
And club captains have been backed in, providing on-field stability with a lengthy term of leadership. Scott Pendlebury is just the sixth club captain since Matthews anointed Tony Shaw more than 30 years ago.
It’s a remarkably stable organisation given the topsy turvy nature and pressure that exists in professional sport.
So, it’s no surprise that the process the club went through to secure McRae was in-depth, intense, and left no stone unturned. Nothing was left to chance.
What is a surprise, is the shambles of a year Collingwood has just endured.
Given the calibre of administrators at the club I am puzzled how the salary cap and retention of players got so off track. Graham Wright has indicated there is still mess to sort through and further player movement is likely.
And just as harmful to the club is the ongoing board feud.
Collingwood must decide on its president asap. If Korda, as indicated by him, is to step down at the end of next season, I don’t get why he is in the chair now.
I confess to not knowing a lot about the current board and its members, but I will say, either one of Paul Licuria or Perter Murphy would each make an outstanding president if given the opportunity. Or it may well be Jeff Browne.
Whoever wins the vote at the December board election must be in it for the long haul.
For a club that just had its worst ever finish to a season, 17th on the ladder, uncertainty at the top level is a killer.
McRae needs the clearest and cleanest run into his first season, and following years, as coach, by having stability at the helm. His assistants need it, and the playing list needs it. Then Collingwood has a chance, because it is by no means a bottom-of-the-ladder team.
When I went to Collingwood in 2000, it had finished the previous season 16th out of 16.
But it also had a president who had been in the position for one year and was a certainty to be there for the long run. It boasted a new CEO straight out of the corporate world in Greg Swann, who remained in the role for seven years.
And it had a playing list that needed a dramatic overhaul. Given the freshness and focus of the new club leaders, I knew as coach that I had full support to make some very tough decisions.
Premiership player Damian Monkhorst had to go. Gavin Brown and Gavin Crosisca were nearing the end of their careers. And too many fringe players, playing for a bottom club, weren’t going to make us better.
At the end of my term Nathan Buckley took over a team that had won a premiership and just competed in a grand final.
The Magpies in 2000 had low membership numbers, an ageing and derelict ground to train on, and they were in debt with nowhere near the sponsorship dollars required to run a successful football club. Now, it has money in the bank, great membership numbers, and an outstanding training facility.
Collingwood today is far too big to fail.
That is why, at the most unstable time in the club’s history, unnecessary disruptions must be dealt with.
The Pies need a president in place who can stay in the role for years to come.
Mark Anderson is still fairly new to the CEO’s role, so he needs to commit to at least five more years. Graham Wright is an excellent appointment as general manager of football and hopefully stays on for a good length of time.
A strong football administration can clear the way for McRae to have an impact on the list and get his fingerprints on what he needs to go forward.
You don’t get honeymoons at Collingwood. The coaching job comes with immediate high expectations. But Collingwood people have an in-built patience while demanding a lot.
McRae is a winner.
He played in three premierships with the Brisbane Lions, coached a VFL title in 2019, and assisted at Richmond in its premiership years. Knowing how to win is as important a quality as any for a coach, and McRae has it.
In 2011 he displayed a football intelligence at Collingwood that I liked. As well as football smarts, his calm disposition made him easy to get along with. He didn’t try to dominate any discussions but had good strong ideas to contribute.
As such a likeable person he will win over the Magpie Army, without seeking the limelight, which is hard to do at Collingwood.
And most importantly, he’ll have a big impact on the playing group very early on because he understands players.
There’s no doubt he’ll win over the likes of Brodie Grundy, Taylor Adams and Darcy Moore immediately. And once you have your core player group understanding what you want, they become your disciples and preach the word with a great flow-on effect through the list.
Because of this, I predict a very quick reversal in form and ladder position.
Collingwood has the backbone of a very good side. Grundy as ruck, Moore the key back, and Brody Mihocek the key forward. Throw in Jordan De Goey, Adams, Josh Daicos, Jack Crisp and Brayden Maynard and it is a team of infinite potential.
I do believe that it is time for Scott Pendlebury to reconsider his position as captain.
Not because he’s not a great captain, he is, but as a player he struggled at the end of this season. There were worrying signs with his delivery and his capacity to win the 25-plus disposals needed to play in the midfield. If he’s going to play on he will need to fully focus on his form.
Similarly, Steele Sidebottom is playing well below par and also needs to focus in on a big pre-season.
The standout for captaincy is Adams. At 28 he has three or four very good seasons in front of him.
The years ahead for Collingwood rest on a stable foundation being formed. And that all depends on what the club does right now
One of the more balanced articles from Michael. He usually finds an opportunity to promote himself. He would know more about the patience of the Pie fans, although I'm still not convinced. The evidence would indicate that the club doesn't change coaches or administrators a lot, so he makes a good case.
I noted the players who didnt make the team with Melbourne's win. We are a long way from that, although we do have some good players. Let's hope he's right about Mcrae and our future.
He forgot to mention that Bucks was a kick away from being a Premiership coach & that he himself was a kick away from not being a Premiership coach (at Collingwood).It was balanced. For Mick. Although he did find a way to promote himself, a little, and to hardly mention Bucks. But overall a reasonable assessment, and some encouraging words for us.
He might be feeling sentimental…
True mate. I remember Robbie Muir saying he used to get urinated on in the showers after games. By his own teammates when he first arrived.What about the Whole AFL and not just pick on Collingwood
Sorry didn't realise this is old news.Why is this person tweeting today about a Q+A episode that aired in February?
Why is this person tweeting today about a Q+A episode that aired in February?
Miss this?He usually finds an opportunity to promote himself.
Is any of it factually incorrect?Miss this?
"At the end of my term Nathan Buckley took over a team that had won a premiership and just competed in a grand final."
And his standard clip of Bucks?
"And most importantly, he’ll have a big impact on the playing group very early on because he understands players."
Stood out like the proverbial to me.Miss this?
"At the end of my term Nathan Buckley took over a team that had won a premiership and just competed in a grand final."
And his standard clip of Bucks?
"And most importantly, he’ll have a big impact on the playing group very early on because he understands players."
Mick just cannot let it go. Buckleys fault for getting his job. Otherwise a great read.Stood out like the proverbial to me.
Anytime he brings up his stint at Carlton its never about his results there, its always about the board instability he had to deal with.Mick just cannot let it go. Buckleys fault for getting his job. Otherwise a great read.
He did mention that he coached Collingwood to a premiership twice.One of the more balanced articles from Michael. He usually finds an opportunity to promote himself. He would know more about the patience of the Pie fans, although I'm still not convinced. The evidence would indicate that the club doesn't change coaches or administrators a lot, so he makes a good case.
I noted the players who didnt make the team with Melbourne's win. We are a long way from that, although we do have some good players. Let's hope he's right about Mcrae and our future.
He did mention that he coached Collingwood to a premiership twice.
I do agree though that if Korda plans to step down at the end of 2022 he shouldn’t be President- unless he has to oversee a big Collingwood projectYou gotta accept that with Mick. Actually I made a trip to bunnings this morning to discuss my current life problems with the guy on the painting desk, and I heard Mick on sportstalk on the ABC and it's been a while since I've heard him on radio.....and he was a lot less bullish. Maybe senility has crept in.
I do agree though that if Korda plans to step down at the end of 2022 he shouldn’t be President- unless he has to oversee a big Collingwood project
" Players at teams who missed finals or lost an elimination final are due back on November 22 (1-4 year players) or December 6 (five-plus year players), while the rest of the finalists are due back on November 9 (1-4 year players) or December 6 (five-plus year players) "
I'm confused, so the players that played finals start pre-season EARLIER than those that didn't?