Saints are so hard to predict, I think bottom 6 but they could easily be top 6, like, the way the team was made is weird to me, there seems to be no cohesion, people say they are better when Marshall and Ryder are in, but why are they so different? It's strange to me
Both teams expected to rise, we don't know who the jumper is but history tells us there will be one, not the craziest suggestion to think it will be swans
Two teams change in yours, legit look at the past, you'll see how much it differs, don't think people realise just how much
How is swans and gws a surprise here ? Both played finals, swans went well until their youth got the better of them...
More importantly this ladder just doesn't go with recent years, there is usually a surprise bolter from outside the 8, you've basically got the same as last year with Carlton...
The side that was fielded yea it was, fox footy did the comparison like every week of the finals.
Having jetta and Jones not playing increases the age yes but irrelevant to the team that played
I think no man's land is a club that thinks it has a chance but it is relying on good players in a trade period that prob won't come. Adelaide and roos don't fit under this criteria, they are improving sides
Cats may,
Because x does this it means I shouldn't be criticised... who cares. I am picking up this as how well your team does is irrelevant, Like that other guy who replied saying we shouldn't comment because our teams have won flags...
we aren't the players, we didn't win anything, we can focus on...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.