Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why are we worrying about the hawks so much??
Well I ask again Albert, If Adelaide have delivered nothing (they finished 3rd in 2002 and 5th in 2003), then going by that scale, what have the Kangaroos delivered?
Re: Re: Re: Why are we worrying about the hawks so much??
North are officially owned by Collingwood.
How doesn't the question not make sense Albert Enstein?
I'll ask again, deep breaths, think, you can do it! If Collingwood delivered little, on that scale, what have the Kangaroos...
Re: Re: Re: Why are we worrying about the hawks so much??
I'm talking in the 3 year period.. In that period, what have you delivered?
If 2 GF appearances is nothing, I would hate to think what the Kangaroos have delivered in this period?
Apart from providing Collingwood training...
AFL rules say you have to pay 92 to 95% of your salary cap.
That's why many players are overpaid, on every list.
If Collingwood wanted to pay players minimum levels it couldn't, the AFL forces clubs to pay 92% to 95% of the salary cap allocation
You would go where your career prospects are best. Where that is irrelevant.
Far as many people who want to work in their home area, there are as many people who want to prove their worth in different markets and areas.
Don't change the subject, we aren't arguing whether both clubs are entitled to playing on that day.
Is giving Melbourne sole hosting rights, which gives them 100% gate takings, an example of Eddie wearing his Channel 9 hat?