Remove this Banner Ad

Recent content by Toppa

  1. T

    Recommitted Rowan Marshall [OOC 2027] - Requested Trade to Geelong, didn't get done

    Respectfully i disagree. Saints have asked for F1. You've offered this year's. Cats believe it's reasonable and saints disagree for a contracted and required player. Saints have a clear role and purpose for him next year. Fact remains, cats pursued Marshall for 2 years, have no doubt offered...
  2. T

    List Mgmt. 2025 List Management Discussion - Part IV

    Cats have basically done the exact same thing (assuming sdk isn't traded) and there hasn't been a word about it. Couldn't give a stuff what others think. Great move by the club. Things change and I for one am stoked we didn't continue with him, waste a pick and cash when he isnt needed just to...
  3. T

    Recommitted Rowan Marshall [OOC 2027] - Requested Trade to Geelong, didn't get done

    The cats have just done exactly the same thing... minus the scathing pile on. Interesting. In any event I love it. More power to the clubs is a good thing, makes trade period FAR more interesting and only improves clubs chances of changing their fortune's quickly
  4. T

    Traded Charlie Curnow [Traded with #31, #42, '27 R2 (Carl) to Sydney for Hayward, #11, '26 & '27 R1 (Syd)]

    Cats have just done a saints. Love it!
  5. T

    Opinion "Why free agency has become an unmitigated disaster as a player movement mechanism"

    Few ideas. Salary cap: Has to remain except remove the minimum amount that needs to be paid whatever that percentage is. Allow clubs to build thru the draft banking as much cash as they want which they can then spend when they think they are ready. Kind of exists now but there is a time limit...
  6. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    It would appear to me that our interest might be because we are uncertain in kings knee long term. But that's just a guess. I will certainly watch with interest but note bit rough on the kid debuting against thr cats in Geelong.
  7. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    Outside your very obvious untouchables, I don't particularly want any other port player more than another. Farrell suggestion was purely based on age and he walks into our best 22 I'd have thought. Berry and or Whitlock may be the better long term prospect, but us losing Nas sends us backwards...
  8. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    Rash has a vastly different view of Farrell. That's ok, every team board has their whipping boys.
  9. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    Well if that is even close to true I withdraw my interest lol.
  10. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    Ahahaha yes he does. Media are parasites. I personally don't believe anything they say, especially when they discuss players salaries. I'd be shocked if Nas decision was money based, by that i mean he leaves because saints wont match his salary. Media saying we are at 1.4 and SA clubs are at 2...
  11. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    Thanks for the reply. As I said no idea re contact status etc.
  12. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    You don't rate him? I'll admit I don't watch a heap of port games but from the outside he seems to be a player port wants distributing the ball and Looks to be a beautiful kick. Berry and Whitlock have obviously been mentioned - in know nothing of either but my preference for a player is...
  13. T

    News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

    I think he is gone and I don't think Ade is in the mix. Saints probably prefer they were for trade purposes but i think he is only leaving for port. ports top end talent is miles better than saints. I'd take saints youth but I don't think either team is a serious contender in the near future. I...
  14. T

    Recommitted Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera - two year extension

    We are in agreement in some respects. Where we disagree is where the onus is to get the deal done because it certainly isn't on stkilda. Your proposal above, pick 8 and future is not a bad deal, in fact it's probably a great deal But i dont think it is attractive to stkilda. We are not...
  15. T

    Recommitted Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera - two year extension

    Sounds like you have kind of answered your own question (that is you have nothing to offer of any real value) but I'll play along.. I'd personally accept. Butters = not gonna happen Rozee as above Bergman and a top 5 pick this year ( will possibly become a 9/10 plus when all is said and done...
See more

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom