Search results for query: *

"People feel that things are going badly, tnat there somebody who has to be accountable for it," ... No shit? Obviously SOMEBODY, ie leadership, should be held accountable for constant failures. What a stupid comment.

I'd say naming those who support him is a "I dare you" type move.

Anyone else feel like rushing Murray and Rankine back in is a mistake? Sydney will belt us, why risk either of those 2 when the buy is next week? Self-preservation at management level? Still the most obvious, pissweak bare minimum changes you can imagine.

Watched it, they did discuss it, but it was a bit weak. No real analysis, just nebulous comments. Others have highlighted our disastrous drafting (On the Couch), or Nicks's terrible record against decent sides - specifics are always helpful.

The external review lost all momentum when the management excluded themselves from the review.

Good point... I wonder what Woosher is up to these days?

Appointed by Roo and Chapman - two of the chief architects of the cluster**** we've been treated to over the last ~7 years. Nobody in the executive team can realistically be held to account while these two have any fingerprints left; they excluded themselves from accountability, so they cant...

Christ, what a joke we've become. Honest conversations with ALL players should be happening constantly, even more so with the underperformers!! Are we meant to applaud them for making a show of it now?

Hoped Olsen a Chairman would be a genuine agent of change - but it's just the same old bullshit. With the AFL/SANFL involvement, who actually appoints our Chair? There is genuine quality amongst SANFL and Adelaide Businesspeople (Rowey called it after the match, as well), it shouldn't be so...

Send this to Rowey, let's keep him angry!

Said this repeatedly at the time - Crouch was clearly the escape-goat for the senior players, when he was far more deserving of selection than a number of the others.

Thanks for doing that Shane - I suspect if you went through most games this year, you'd find similar efforts from Laird and Smith. I'm not sure what's more pathetic, their non-efforts, or the refusal of Nicks to hold them accountable.

If you were cynical, you'd wonder if bringing Strchan in against Nankervis was deliberate, so he'd get bullied by an absolute unit of a human.

What the **** is this Clubs obsession with Laird? A limited footballer who had a purple patch years ago, and is still living off of it. He's a good back pocket, play him there, because he is a shit midfielder. I said we should've traded him when he had that one decent season, wish we did.

Absolute waste of time. 273m gained.

Press conference is dismal. Basically can't state what the problem is, but we know how we want/need to be, so we just have to get back to that... He's got no idea. And refusal to discuss individual performances, wtf is that about? Except he's happy to about Max when pressed, just not...

Again, "We're not good enough," Someone ask him why, ffs.

"No excuses, we just need to be better." Oh, ok.

Let's see what the useless bald prick has to say.

And the leadership in general - caller said if they had any integrity they'd fall on their swords, "They won't, because they've got it too good and too easy. They'll never get another job as good as this, so they won't move on by choice."

Rowey really pouring some shit onto Roo :hearteyes: Says we could've got Vozzo, but Roo didn't like him, so killed it.

I don't think he's defended Nicks, more said it's a whole of Club problem, and changing the coach won't fix that. Definitely hasn't said Nicks is the right coach.

Looks like this;

Can't believe people bother to even read his posts anymore, they're nonsensical ramblings :tearsofjoy:

Rowey saying change is needed, but the Board won't make it - too self interested and know that if they act with accountability, they're out too.

Rowey is going nuclear <3

We need Sydney to bury us, then it is non-tenable. (It already should be)