Search results for query: *

Personally love the way Parker plays so may be deluding myself that he could be a big improver. I think the key with him is how he is used. I think he could step straight into the middle as his body is AFL ready, but concerned Horse may use him as a small forward or a sub for that matter. Swans...

Glad to hear they are contesting it lots of talk that the 1 week would be accepted. I am assuming there is no danger of 2 weeks if the appeal fails? Personally I think it is a joke that he could go up for something like that - free kick yes but thats it. However the system is fairly inflexible...

Would that reason not be Hall??? Even if he plays badly he creates opportunities for other forwards, he gets the best defender plus guys dropping back to cover him. Same with Rocca for Collingwood, if he plays like a dog he is still important because the opposition is always trying to cover...

Pies did it with Buckley but he is no longer our key number one player, we were simply trying to extend an old guys career (could say it didnt work as well). Am not sure if Collingwood would have rested him last year if finals were 50/50 chance. Hall is your #1 key player & will win or lose...

Barry Hall looked to be moving pretty well against Collingwood. If he took his opportunities & had a bit of luck it would have been a good game for him. Surprised when they said he has got problems, because if he did he would not have covered as much territory as he did. I think its a confidence...

Simple fix with the umpires crucifying Barry, simply play him on Rocca or vice versa and no free kicks will be paid either way.