Search results for query: *

Yes, it was pretty obvious that was your first priority to establish. Unfortunately, you’ve got form.

Phew! That would have been a relief for you Aristotle.

Possibly going to go the Ristevski route, if he absolutely has to. Plead guilty to killing Samantha, but say it was an accident. Thereby he doesn’t have to give evidence or get cross examined. Therefore hoping he escapes with manslaughter at the worst.

So in your opinion. anyone who campaigned against Dan Andrews falls into the same category as these murdering scum? What a moronic, opportunistic post. I’m surprised you didn’t extend it to anyone who voted against Dan.

Tell us all what happened then Soc.

Perhaps you should take it on-board and reflect on your posting style. I’m just trying to be helpful.

Guess I’m prejudging it to a large extent. I feel that it’s highly likely he did do it. That’s why I feel for Higgins. Yes I know I’m not in the right position to come to that conclusion definitively. But this is an internet forum, not a jury panel, so I’m comfortable with that.

Hopefully Lisa Wilkinson doesn’t feel compelled to come out and make another of her self serving, moronic contributions. Having said that, I think Higgins has been very hard done by. I give more credence to her version than Lehrmann’s.

Somewhere out there, there’s a tree whose single purpose on earth is to replace the oxygen you waste. Go find it and apologize.