Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. Fifty

    Analysis THE "WE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SPP" TEARS THREAD

    Gonna be fascinating seeing how this match up affects SPP. Will we see a new hesitant, apologetic persona afraid to impose his physicality on the club he grew up supporting and playing ressies for, or will the snub spark an incredible hulk, destruction come-thee god mode?? Can't wait. Sent...
  2. Fifty

    Analysis THE "WE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SPP" TEARS THREAD

    Cheers to all the above. I am sure PAFC will return the bending over favour at some point in the future, just hopefully not with SPP [emoji6] Venables looks a very likely sort. True, him and SPP will be compared for years just like Ebert and Danger are. Adelaide was way in front of that...
  3. Fifty

    Analysis THE "WE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SPP" TEARS THREAD

    I understand your sentiment, but I think you guys still don't get the Ebert significance to PAFC dating back nearly 100 years including father, grandfathers, great grandfathers, uncles and cousin on both paternal and maternal sides of his family. SPP to WCE aint in the same universe. Anyway...
  4. Fifty

    Analysis THE "WE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SPP" TEARS THREAD

    Bumping this thread for the week coming. I'm sure Sam will have some 'pep' in his step this week, and wanting to prove a point. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
  5. Fifty

    Analysis THE "WE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SPP" TEARS THREAD

    Maybe. Still, led the game for clearances (10). Ten of his 17 possies were contested (equal 2nd for Port). All of this in only 60% time on ground (lowest other than injured Boak). From a five game rookie, we'll take that thank you very much. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Back
Top