Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    So in summary, we are in violent agreement, that players born after 1988 have been an inferior generation to the earlier born players.
  2. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    Zverev is clearly the best performed post 1990 birth, with 3 Masters titles and certainly has time to make a mark on the Grand Slams. However, I strongly believe we should have seen more challenge from the age group as a whole. It is incomprehensible that players like Isner and Anderson still...
  3. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    That does not explain why the Millman was the youngest player to make the last 8 at Flushing Meadow. There is an abundance of younger players on the circuit and they should by now be outperforming the likes of Cilic, DelPotro and Isner, or do you believe that the generation of players born in...
  4. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    But if the likes of Del Potro, Wawrinka and Cilic could take a Grand Slam when the 3 are about, why cannot the current younger players. Note Del Potro was just 21 when he defeated Federer in the final after overcoming Nadal in the semi final.
  5. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    I know you are having your personal war with the OP, but this still does not address why Cilic, Del Potro and Wawrinka have won Grand Slams but nobody born since 1988 has been able to achieve that. Why did John Millman (born in 1989) get through to the last 8 when the young guns that should be...
  6. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    I have never disagreed with you on this issue.
  7. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    This seems a very circular discussion with no purpose. The point of the thread is that no male player born since 1988 has won a Grand Slam. This remains the case with Cilic the youngest of those to have been successful. The OP is suggesting that the age group below is simply not good enough...
  8. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    While the better use of health and nutrition might be adding to longevity, it does not explain why nobody born after 1990 has yet made a real impact. Physical prime is generally 24 to 28 and the players in that age bracket have access to everything that is available to those that are older...
  9. B

    Edited: No player currently 30 or younger has won a major

    Clearly there is a failure by the younger players to step up and push the older players aside in the rankings. The fact that the average age of the top 100 is increasing is in itself a statement on the lack of achievement of the younger players.
Back
Top