Search results for query: *

Lucky I was correct, I suppose. Oh well, that is a shame. There was always something that I liked about him. Sorry for passing him off onto you guys by the way

*the (sic) is there because I'm not sure how to spell it. Anyway, as a Cats fan, I always had a bit of a soft spot for Nathan and had an interest in following his progress once he left the club. I saw most of the Sydney game (bad luck, by the way, but you played some nice football) and...

I wasn't there. What the hell were our supporters going on about? I mean, it wasn't a dirty game, no?

No no I got your point perfectly - I just don't agree with you that they are more important to your structure because you have players who are better than each of those outlined in their positions. We don't, and that's why I think that Ling and Ablett are more important to us than Higgins et al...

They are surely not more important to the Dogs as those four (esp the first two) are to us. West isn't your best ball-getter (that'd be Cross), Higgins not your best small forward, Callan not your best small stopper (Dale Morris). No-one in our team - in the league! - is as creative as Ablett...

He is being sincere. So am I. It reminds me a lot of when we got whupped by the Lions in 2002, it was a reminder of where we were and how good we really had to become. We learnt a hell of a lot for it.

After his performance in the 2005 SF against Sydney, I could not say that Huddo is biased. And for God's sakes, if you think that those four names - good as they are - are the equal of Egan, Ablett, Ling and Wojak then you are really deluding yourself.

Doggystyle - of course what happened last year is relevant to us being the benchmark for this year! I mean, fantastic players don't become mid-level mediocrity overnight, unless they're Warren Tredrea. That, and we have been simply murderous over the last few weeks. Our percentage is a good...

And just in answer to doggystyle - I absolutely cannot wait for this game. Not just because it's first v second but for a couple of other reasons - 1) The two styles are so different - Are you saying our kicking and handballs are not precise?. Seen may of our games lately? No. What...

*** Gets out the sacrificial lamb ***

Honestly I think I could, say, breathe and you'd call it arrogant. For God's Sakes, you're playing a team that's lost one game all year, has won its past four by an average of about eighty points, and last year won every award under the sun bar the Coleman and Australian of the Year. What's...

I absolutely cannot wait for this game. Not just because it's first v second but for a couple of other reasons - 1) The two styles are so different - Both are fast, but you are fast when carrying the ball whilst our kicking/handball is so precise that it's fast, no-one ever breaks stride...

All this crapola about Geelong fans being arrogant, honestly it's just profiles set up by other users like geelong_crazy 26 which give us a bad name. As for the rest of us, we tend to keep our wonderment to the Geelong board, where we're all collectively pinching ourselves and telling each...

And with good reason. You should've won one of 97/98 - actually, no, just 98, we should've won 97....