Just put them on ignore bud, that's what I do. No longer have to read the dribble from certain posters (we all know who they are) and it makes BF that much more enjoyable. Ignore button is there for a reason..
Lol Conca is 24, hardly old. Players improve all the time. To write a player off before the season has even started due to past performance alone is ludicrous and creates a poor environment which discourages improvement. IF Conca reaches the point where he is clearly best 22 he should be given...
I'm concerned about Lennons commitment to the club. Every year there are whispers he is looking to be on the move. Even if he does have a big year - and that's a big if - who's to say he doesn't just pack his bag and actually make it to another team next offseason. His currency will be up, sure...
Now you're starting to talk some sense. It does appear we both have different ranking systems. For example, and this is very generalised, but I would see each list has ~5 great players, ~10 good players, ~10 above average/role players. As I think Miles is top 5/6 at our club, then that falls...
Didn't realise "great" status is limited to the 22 players named in the AA side. Stupid statement. Have not once claimed him to be a champion (a great player, but not a champion), merely pointing out the flaws in your argument... Which there are plenty.
What are you talking about? Horrible statement, and your "statistics" are baseless.
Miles was ranked #14 for total contested possessions (above Selwood, Heppell, Parker, Pendlebury, Ward...)
Miles was ranked #12 for clearances (ahead of Mitchell, Swan, Hannebery, Parker...)
As well as top 60...
In his prime? Miles was delisted at the end of his second season and has flourished at a new club. I would hardly say footballers enter their prime in their second year. Move on mate.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.