Search results for query: *

Yeh, once you are proven wrong and still say, I’m right, you are just fishing and trolling. However.... As I said in my first post. My problem was the umpiring detracted from the game. The jaeger, worpel, Sicily issues. None had any impact on the game outside the umpiring impact. Nobody was...

“Upon review, the AFL found that the free against Worpel should not have been paid” Even the afl thinks you are wrong.

“Upon review, the AFL found that the free against Worpel should not have been paid” from the age. Tell me again.

Doesn't that only apply once the umpire has begun his movement to bounce, which in the Worpel case - he hadn't. As a side note, if you watch the replay, the movement of Worpel had 0 impact on the game as the umpire had not begun his run in. Like with the Sicily free kick, both detracted from...

Even if that is correct, the word is "bounced". Which means the action must be complete to judge it. This is very similar to the NFL, where you are only offside when the ball is "snapped", you may be offside, but get back onside before the snap and be fine. Lets be honest, we didnt lose the...