Search results for query: *

If that is the case, then somebody needs to tell the WA press, they must be getting that information from somewhere.

I can't see North trading for Pick 1 now, unless the price is right, and some of the suggestions from the WC fans are beyond ludicrous. West Coast's priority is Curtin, while North sees him as gettable now that we have picks 2 and 3, all North have to do is infer that Curtin is on its radar and...

Feels like a steal to me, pick 3 for an injury prone fullback. Happy.

I thought the concept of tying compensation to finishing position was to ensure clubs that finish at the bottom of the ladder aren't fleeced of their "best talent" by the top clubs, prolonging their stay at the bottom.

How?

Sorry, you are correct, but he is 35yo so we are getting nothing.

He is unrestricted, we get nothing.

It does seem a little odd, but I guess we are placing our faith in a young kid by the name of Comben who we selected a couple of years ago.

If we wanted Cadman we wouldn't have agreed to the deal, I think we are looking at two from Wardlaw, Tsatas or Sheezel.

I don't think I have ever said Port need to add a player to JHF deal, I don't know enough about the PA playing list to decide on one we should demand.

Adding a player is an unnecessary complication and a stupid idea.

This isn't about fair, this is about GWS wanting to get pick one to guarantee they can select the player they want which I'm assuming that to be Cadman. If they are that desparate they should be willing to pay overs to make it attractive.

This deal only becomes a good deal for North if Port has massive injuries issues next season and finishes in the bottom five.

Trading Picks 3 & 12 for pick 1 is grand larceny. GWS need to throw North another pick in the teens.

Walk away North, this deal is sh!t

We are giving up two pick ones and a future 2nd (probably around 20-25) for 2, 3 and a future 1st (probably in the teens). If Brady spends more than 2 seconds thinking about this deal before saying no, he shouldn't be in the job, this is terrible for us from every angle.

There has been some discussion today about GWS giving North picks 3 & 12 for pick 1, but in this new "mega" deal we only get pick 3 off GWS for pick 1. If we are going to trade with GWS for pick 1, I would hope we do it separately as we are getting shafted royally here. BTW I'm yet to be...

I hope Brady says no.

Sorry Scheissenfest, it's due diligence on the part of the North Melbourne Football Club. If JHF is that desperate to return to his mummy it would be criminal of NMFC not ask Adelaide to see if they would be interested in him, it doesn't matter if he wants to go there or not. It's then up to...

That's for Adelaide to work out, I don't care. If JHF wants to return home we are not doing what is best for NMFC if we don't ask Adelaide what they can offer. It may even get Port's attention and force them to offer what we want and not what they are willing part with.

Do they? Tell him if he wants to return home it's the Crows or he stays at Arden Street next season.

Give up on Port and shop him to the Crows. Pick 5 & 23 plus next year' s first.

3.2m over four years for a 19yo, JHF must be a very good player. If Port think he is worth that much, then two first rounders (no futures) should be the minimum we ask for.

I think he knows we are closer to a flag than the Tigers.

Rumour going round that he is heading to Gold Coast

It will be interesting to see what the signing of Greenwood will do with out draft hand. Is it now possible to package 20, 42 & 47 for a pick in the teens in the hope of selecting a Van Rooyen, Draper or Mac Andrew.

Everybody has an opinion. The Roos and Tigers are ‘miles apart’ at the trade table. It seems one is likely going to have to pay ‘unders’

We should walk away from all negotiations with Richmond and select him in the PSD. Also force the Tigers to pick Tarrant up as a free agent if they want him.

I think you're right, we pick up Stack with Pick 1 in the PSD.

Can't see this happening, North are playing nice by agreeing to trade out Tarrant so it doesn't effect your compo claims, I'd expect Richmond to do the same and not make a play for our top two picks.