Search results for query: *

That may be the case but that's just another reason for not going ahead with the project

In addition to the above I am not sure why they pushed linking the project to Christchurch Te Kaha stadium First proposed 10 years ago...

Yes, very optimistic But a business case is never pessimistic otherwise it won't be put forward To me it is someone's dream scenario rather than a realistic functioning stadium Personally, i don't think an AFL team in Tasmania will be a success but that's just my opinion I will be surprised if...

In my opinion $715 million (reduced from $750) is way too much money for a stadium with a 23,000 capacity for AFL I do not have access to the actual business case documents So, all i had to go on was this ABC "business case" article with the link below Hobart AFL stadium business case...

It is all about the AFL getting players on board and to a lesser extent clubs to gain another round of footy How to achieve this is with money It will end up just being another round of footy that the AFL will add a name to like "indigenous" rounds etc As long as each state gets a go i don't see...

You can't even get that right

Looks like i will join JohnnyBannanas and avoid this thread.

You conveniently chose the closest suburb on the southern border to use as an argument Why not use Bribie Island, Donnybrook, Caboolture (largest population and has about 8,000 more than Redcliffe), Morayfield, Woodford, Beerburrum the list is endless. Most places and population live closer to...

Not sure what you mean. I was replying to NoobPie "A decent portion of the population of Moreton Bay Region can get to Brisbane quicker than Redcliffe." This comment is clearly not the case.

Redcliffe is just a small part of Moerton Bay Regional Council as can be seen from the below map