Take it to that thread then if you're so confident Mr astronaut.
Yes I kill animals,they are food...there's a thread you can take that to also.
Stop being an Internet coward,just go to relevant threads?
Killing animals is tough,shopping in Coles is easy for a loud mouthed internet coward I guess?
My god could be imaginary....but you guys obsesss about him.
Homosexuals are so cool,can you explain why woman have a vagina and men have a penis?
And sheep are stupid,why do people keep thinking these are intelligent animals?
What is the hating gays thing?
Having sex with your own sex is a sin,it seems obvious.
I personally pray that lost homosexuals will be forgiven...
How can you just catoragise a group of people who can only have oral or anal sex as normal?
Men have penises,woman have vaginas,if that grosses...
Have to say I do agree with that,but that shouldn't stop you from researching some of the theories being offered,
It's possible they go hand in hand with your beliefs,while its also possible they do not. It's all very unknown on most fronts.
Is it possible our senses will never have the...
Agree in part,which for me is enough and I hope you agree with that.
I did say in a later post that while I think there is a creator,at this point that creator could be anything.
Chances are we were created my an advanced version of ourselves,and we will go on to create what we perceive we have now.
Looks like you've mentioned the black hole just before I did. :thumbsu:
I think the chance of a god,if you want to call it that is still possible. it's certainly looking like there could be a creator of some kind although this universe could just as easily have been created by a previous...
Technically no,at this point we are just possibility perceiving that it is. Like I said,it's a left field idea in some ways,but so is the Big Bang we are currently theorising in many ways also.
Billions of dollars are being spent on research on this two dimensional theory so it does have some...
If we are now looking at the universe as a possible two dimensional hologram as the study is suggesting,there must be something projecting it as three dimensional. If everything in the universe is code,who's to say it isn't computer code?
It's possible our universe is in fact just computer code...
I think the main thing that studies like this are showing is that what we think we know might be a fair way away from what is actually the truth.
Some of it is certainly opening up the real possibility of a creator. If it is possible to be so far off what we previously thought the universe...
Why don't you just use google for yourself,I'm not your lab assistant.
If you want to not believe misconduct and fruad takes place within the religion of science suit yourself.
Any proof you can pass on that a god or creator doesn't exist?
Maybe something we could class as fact or are you just going to supply an interpretation of the word fact?
I'm not sure of your point here,Laws change. The religion of science says Gravity is a law but the simple fact is they cannot prove it.
The religion of Christianity would say it's a law to believe a god exists,they also claim to have evidence,but again cannot prove it. The religion of...
Falsifying evidence and misconduct within the religion of science is well known,there are numerous papers on the topic.
With such a heavy reliance on funding it is certainly plausible to suggest some of this misconduct is overlooked within the religion of sciences community,it would be pure...
No,I'm just open minded to the fact there is no proof God or a creator of some kind exists,nor is there any proof a god or creator doesn't exist.
Calling others names to support what one believes or what one doesn't does not change these facts in any way.
He is not my god,I am not a Christian. I can think of nothing more arrogant than saying god doesn't exist without proof while at the same time supporting the Big Bang,dark matter,dark energy or Gravity without proof.
It doesn't seem a logical viewpoint. It does seem a hypothetical viewpoint though.
I have reached no conclusion,I only offered the question.
You were disappointed conspiracy was mentioned,which I agree,and I believe a perfectly legitimate discussion regarding arrogance/intelligence was destroyed by Chelsea bringing religions into the discussion and then conspiracy when he got...
The raising of the conspiracy by Chelsea was extremely immature indeed.
He made the comment that the religion he doesn't like is arrogant and then made the wide ranging statement that people in his religion are beyond reproach. In fact,no one was singling out any particular area of society in...
Do you feel any of these great minds of the religion of science would be beyond reproach if they thought a new theory would jeopardise government funding?
Do you feel the religion of science could be locked into theories such as the big bang by governments with the threat of further funding...
Do you feel the research and theories of the religion of science are in some ways bound to,and in other ways jeopardised by modern governments given your religions heavy reliance on government funding?
Your religion can write a book tomorrow and it doesn't make it automatically right.
If you were more confident and less arrogant regarding your own religion you wouldn't clutch to it like its some little teddy bear and care so much about any of the other religions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.