Reply to thread

This is what we're being asked to believe;

1.  Tippett’s agent struck was so uncompromising that everyone involved deliberately broke the rules by not including the trading deal in the playing contract and instead had it written up separately.

2.  After pushing us to break the rules in the first place, when Trigg asked during a phone call to cancel the written side deal, Tippett's agent just said 'no worries, consider it done'.

3.  And that the material change to the initial agreement was agreed to without any further form of financial compensation to be exchanged between the AFC and Tippett.  A key part of the deal was just gifted back because Triggy asked for it.

It's absolutely laughable that anyone could swallow this garbage, let alone continue to put it out there as some form of support for a bloke that was clearly out of his depth at the level.