I've heard from someone who claims to have some inside knowledge. Its hard for me to say if its true but theyve been correct so far.MXETT, haven't you got some inside mail about infractions.....does that mail still seem solid?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've heard from someone who claims to have some inside knowledge. Its hard for me to say if its true but theyve been correct so far.MXETT, haven't you got some inside mail about infractions.....does that mail still seem solid?
I thought that simply being in possession of a commercial quantity is enough to land a trafficking charge....Question for the legal eagles on here. If Sandor Earl has been charged with trafficking and he hasn't been selling to NRL players, does this mean he has been selling to participants in a WADA code covered sport such as AFL, or does trafficking include flogging it local gym junkies?
He hasn't been charged with trafficking by the police, but by a sporting body. This isn't criminal trafficking, it is sports trafficking. ie. supplying someone within a WADA covered sport with banned drugs.I thought that simply being in possession of a commercial quantity is enough to land a trafficking charge....
I've heard from someone who claims to have some inside knowledge. Its hard for me to say if its true but theyve been correct so far.[/
Based on the info in the charges the afl released last week I was confused why infraction notices werent already issued. I believe that Ess have an escape clause for AOD.
@ mxett, do you believe that until DANK is interviewed Ess are in the clear??
Keen to hear why a staunch Ess supporter has those opinions?? Are you of the opinion TB-4 is the main concern now??
EFAFortunately I think they are coming
Unfortunately I think they are coming
A 6 month ban of 38 Essendon players would destroy the club
Fogdog?I've heard from someone who claims to have some inside knowledge. Its hard for me to say if its true but theyve been correct so far.
EFAEF my enjoyment
LolFogdog?
care to elaborate....
A 6 month ban of 38 Essendon players would destroy the club
If this occurred, and it won't, the afl would have to excuse itself from WADA affiliation as the alternative is unthinkable
As it is preparation for rejecting any serious sanction of the players involving suspension
The AFLs very survival would be threatened if a club like Essendon were destroyed. The consequences are simply unthinkable
Furthermore, the evidence so favours the players that they would take Essendon and the afl to court
What's wrong with you blokes wanting this to happen. Players suing the club,players getting banned, Essendon will be crippled beyond repair etc,etc will be disastrous for the AFL.
Fitzroy died,Carlton nearly went under. The damage this will have on the league will be too much which the AFL want to avoid.
Yep, unfortunately I think infraction notices are now pretty much inevitable.
Will we even be able to field a team next year?
The rule said if a banned substance entered a player's body, unless he is unconscious he is gone. If they feel the club has failed them, and it has, they are entitle to and should, sue the arse off Essendon.They did play the rules ask Dank why he didn't.