Taylor Hunt is your man.We need an upgrade on Morris
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taylor Hunt is your man.We need an upgrade on Morris
thats the type of player or Hannerbery we needBy the way. Tom Mitchell.
29 touches and 13 tackles. Just saying.
Oooooohhhhh shiiiiiitt yeahWe need an upgrade on Morris
Top post but I reckon give them ConcaWould pick 30 in the 2010 draft do it?
Get it done Tiges.Taylor Hunt is your man.
I think we have got a fair share of A graders to win a flag..any extra is a bonus ..my opinion if its about your bottom 5 players in your best 22 ..there the ones that get found out in pressure games if there fairly good u will be in contention...we have the skilled players in our 22 just need to add to it and gain depth ..we need more depth...when we have our best players on the ground we can beat anyone...the maturity of this squad now is the most important thing and yesterday and the last few games we are starting too see the maturity...the sucess is coming real soon..Let get this guy. Imagine a back line with him, Rance, Chaplin. We also need a young top pick ruckman in the draft to develop while Maric can still hold the fort.
What do we need to get to contention? I think we are 4 A graders off.
Rather pick 30 in the 2010 draftTop post but I reckon give them Conca
Can't believe the Tankers could get pick 3 and the Hawks got pick 19 for Buddy.Thats where the system is flawed,Surely a level headed panel could decide what type of draft pick a player worth.Fk frawley, wants a Buddy esque deal and hasnt done anything for years. Let him rot at Melbourne
If a 1st rounder was say after the non-finalists picks rather than a team's own pick it would be much fairer. It's not rocket science yet here we are having to discuss it.Can't believe the Tankers could get pick 3 and the Hawks got pick 19 for Buddy.Thats where the system is flawed,Surely a level headed panel could decide what type of draft pick a player worth.
Good call.If a 1st rounder was say after the non-finalists picks rather than a team's own pick it would be much fairer. It's not rocket science yet here we are having to discuss it.
Just mentioned similar in the Ben Griffiths thread... ideal forward setup would be:We need to fix our forward line, if we had have made the most of the 2nd quarter game was over. Mids to spot up targets better, Vicks and Griff to learn to play together, Jack to play like maybe a Gunstan, Franklin genius forward and we need a Breust, Walters, Ballentine type.
Not for me when we have Astbury already at the club. Would rather spend our money on another gun midfielder.Let get this guy. Imagine a back line with him, Rance, Chaplin. We also need a young top pick ruckman in the draft to develop while Maric can still hold the fort.
What do we need to get to contention? I think we are 4 A graders off.
Its actually meant to be that way ie the worse the team the more the compo for losing a gun player. But the issue is they wont that compo as he wont get enough cash to secure a top pick.Can't believe the Tankers could get pick 3 and the Hawks got pick 19 for Buddy.Thats where the system is flawed,Surely a level headed panel could decide what type of draft pick a player worth.