It wasn't especially effective though from memory. I think it's all a bit much for McStay to handle at present, and the rucks are inconsistent in their forward abilities.We still have our round 1 forward line.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't especially effective though from memory. I think it's all a bit much for McStay to handle at present, and the rucks are inconsistent in their forward abilities.We still have our round 1 forward line.
I have to disagree with you on the set up with our dual rucks. Yes, Martin is the better of the two rucks at the moment but he is above and beyond Luey up front who looks like he is lost at sea up there. Luey needs a stretch as the main ruck to get some confidence back. Lester isn't in the best 22 and has been put down back due to Patfull's departure. Frankly, I don't see him making it in any position.Lets get back to what works- Martin to ruck on his own, and get the midfield working with him solely there, as a unit.
He is far superior to Leuy in holding position and tapping to advantage.
Leuy to be a target up front, use his athleticism. he should be at the very least be able to get to the flight of the ball and create a contest and bring the ball to ground. He needs to lead and run and reload again .
I'd probably give Lester a job as an inside burrowing mid role, much like Crisp's role last year. Give him a can of woop ass and let him loose.
If Lester is dropped I would like to see Mitch Robbo take that role, actually I changed my mind give that role to Mitch, but take the can off him.
I wouldn't mind seeing Lester play as an inside extractor at least for one game. He was good at winning contested possession and clearances last season when used in that position. Surely he gets the nod especially without Rocky and Hanley in the team and it will allow Beams to play a bit more outside then he has been.
I have to disagree with you on the set up with our dual rucks. Yes, Martin is the better of the two rucks at the moment but he is above and beyond Luey up front who looks like he is lost at sea up there. Luey needs a stretch as the main ruck to get some confidence back. Lester isn't in the best 22 and has been put down back due to Patfull's departure. Frankly, I don't see him making it in any position.
I agree with you about Luey, but my point was that the first priority after our first 2 games has to be to get the midfield set, so that's why I'd put Luey up forward.I have to disagree with you on the set up with our dual rucks. Yes, Martin is the better of the two rucks at the moment but he is above and beyond Luey up front who looks like he is lost at sea up there. Luey needs a stretch as the main ruck to get some confidence back. Lester isn't in the best 22 and has been put down back due to Patfull's departure. Frankly, I don't see him making it in any position.
Yep, l agree mate. Atm, Leuy is not in great form in the ruck, he might get taps but he puts them nowhere and doesn't do well up forward. If he needs confidence then put him in the 2's for a bit. Martin shown he can be AA if he is the sole ruck, so lets try and get him back to it.I don't think we should have to jeopardize our best starting ruck formation just so Luey can play himself into form. He can find some confidence in the reserves imo
Yep, l agree mate. Atm, Leuy is not in great form in the ruck, he might get taps but he puts them nowhere and doesn't do well up forward. If he needs confidence then put him in the 2's for a bit. Martin shown he can be AA if he is the sole ruck, so lets try and get him back to it.
Really don't like Lester in the team, his only position would be extractor of the ball. Don't like Paps down back either, should be on the wing stopping switches and moving forward to snag 1 goal or 2 each match.
Would you be open to having Mitch Robinson in there instead of Beams as an extractor so Beams could play more outside.I'd support Lester getting played on ball.
Starting on ball set up of Martin, Beams, Redden and Lester should see us win a bit more contested ball through the middle of the ground. With Lester swapping down back with someone like Rich.
FTFYWould like to say that i have hope that we can win this. But, i am a pessimist, so i know we really don't
Would you be open to having Mitch Robinson in there instead of Beams as an extractor so Beams could play more outside.
While he's got a tough body I've never seen Robinson as someone who has that polish with his decision making and handball to be a real inside distributor. Theres a difference to being a hard nut and being in inside ball winner and Robinson just doesn't have the skills IMO.
Would you be open to having Mitch Robinson in there instead of Beams as an extractor so Beams could play more outside.
Summed up perfectly by Fatcat08
I'd rather Robinson as a defensive forward. Our Pressure was off against the Roos and Robinson, Green and Zorko up forward should help us contain the ball inside our forward fifty. We don't have a gun key forward to kick too so we need those guys pressuring the opposition defenders to cause turnovers in our forward fifty, and therefore, goals.
He can find it but isn't a great accumulator. Execution is the main issue but he is more value than quite a few others at the moment.Robinson as a defensive forward is harping back to the Sam Sheldon days of a guy who can't find the footy or use it well and only in the team to apply pressure.
Robbo is an upgrade on Sheldon however.
Wonder what the crowd size will be, I'd say 27,000 given the tiges popularity and our loyal supporters.
Robinson as a defensive forward is harping back to the Sam Sheldon days of a guy who can't find the footy or use it well and only in the team to apply pressure.
Robbo is an upgrade on Sheldon however.