Surely this is one of those ' you can't sue us because we funded your appeal ' appeals if you know what i mean.
Now considering that the ban wont be overturned and the swiss court would only send it back to CAS, now go with me on this.
Appeal gets sent back to CAS for a re-trail which would render the bans void i would assume reverting back to the original afl ruling, lets say that it is july/ august that this happens, re-trial happens and CAS deliver another guilty verdict on the eve of the 2017 season and impose the rest of the ban of 4/5 months, this would mean that the players miss 3/4's of the 2017 season, this could backfire shockingly for them.
or the swiss courts recover from their fits of laughter and dismiss the appeal claims and the players see out the last 2/3 months of their bans free to resume their lives in 2017.
Now considering that the ban wont be overturned and the swiss court would only send it back to CAS, now go with me on this.
Appeal gets sent back to CAS for a re-trail which would render the bans void i would assume reverting back to the original afl ruling, lets say that it is july/ august that this happens, re-trial happens and CAS deliver another guilty verdict on the eve of the 2017 season and impose the rest of the ban of 4/5 months, this would mean that the players miss 3/4's of the 2017 season, this could backfire shockingly for them.
or the swiss courts recover from their fits of laughter and dismiss the appeal claims and the players see out the last 2/3 months of their bans free to resume their lives in 2017.