Play Nice Happy 10th Anniversary (of the Essendon/ASADA Saga)

Remove this Banner Ad

Jul 2, 2010
38,080
36,356
Adelaide
AFL Club
Carlton


10 years since the Essendon drugs saga: How the biggest scandal in Australian sports history erupted​

From a surprise conference at AFL House to years of accusations, drama and destroyed careers. Recap all the key moments of the Essendon drugs saga here.

Michael Warner
February 5, 2023 - 9:46AM
News Corp Australia Sports Newsroom

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/spor.../7d4cf6f11208b48c7c348df3b579b017#share-tools

The biggest scandal in Australian sports history erupted at a snap press conference at AFL House at 2pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013.
This is how all the key moments unfolded.

THE BOMBERS COME FORWARD

Essendon chairman David Evans, the softly spoken son of late AFL Commission chairman Ron Evans, fronted the cameras in the Mike Sheahan Media Centre flanked by senior coach James Hird and Bombers chief executive Ian Robson.

The club had come forward, Evans explained, to ask the AFL and Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority to investigate concerns about supplements used by its players during the 2012 season.

“The info we gathered over the last 24 or 48 hours is slightly concerning, and we want to dig a bit deeper, but we want the AFL to help us,” he said.

WHAT DID THE PLAYERS TAKE?

The scandal that would consume the game over the following weeks, months and years was the most destructive the game has known. Friendships were ripped apart, the lives of players and officials up-ended, coaches sacked and AFL and anti-doping chiefs accused of systemic leaks, manipulation of evidence and brazen breaches of the law.
In the early months, the focus was on Essendon’s shambolic injections program overseen by sports scientist Stephen Dank and the Bombers’ high-performance boss Dean “The Weapon” Robinson.

It emerged that players had been injected with vitamins and a range of exotically-named substances including the anti-obesity drug AOD-9604 and Thymosin.
Hird was accused of personally injecting “the WADA-black listed drug” hexarelin and came under pressure to stand down.
According to ASADA’s interim report club officials had also self-injected themselves with the artificial tanning drug Melanotan II.


THE “TIP OFF”

The saga turned on its head when it was revealed ASADA investigators had been told about a “tip off” phone call made by AFL boss Andrew Demetriou to Evans in the days before the club “self-reported”.

The manoeuvre would be the trigger for the AFL to conduct a joint investigation with ASADA and give the league control of and access to all confidential information.
Central to the league’s high-stakes strategy was a determination to spare Essendon players from drug bans and protect its billion-dollar commercial contracts – sheeting blame for the program to Hird and other club officials.

Essendon’s decision to “self-report” (and effectively admit to wrongdoing before an ASADA investigation had even begun) came just two days before the dramatic “blackest day in sport” press conference in Canberra where Gillard government ministers – flanked by the heads of all major sporting codes – warned of widespread drug use in Australian sport, match-fixing, and organised crime links.

But the facts would not back up the bravado in a day now widely regarded as a political stunt.

NRL club Cronulla became embroiled in the saga, which dominated the front and back pages of national newspapers.

THE WAR AND SURRENDER

Evans resigned suddenly after the “tip off” story broke in July 2013 and all out war between Hird, Essendon and the AFL ensued with new Bombers boss, billionaire businessman Paul Little, calling on AFL chairman Mike Fitzpatrick to “step in and takeover this process, as I along with a significant percentage of the football public have lost total confidence in the AFL executive to handle this matter”.

But on August 27, 2013, Essendon yielded and was slapped with the heaviest penalties in football history: a $2 million fine, banishment from the finals and the loss of multiple draft picks for governance failings. Hird was suspended for 12 months, football manager Danny Corcoran for six months and assistant coach Mark “Bomber” Thompson fined $30,000.

Club doctor Bruce Reid refused to deal and the charges against him were dropped like a hot potato when he took his case to the Victorian Supreme Court.
How the Herald Sun covered the story.
How the Herald Sun covered the story.

How the Herald Sun covered the story.

It was later revealed that Hird had been showered with a series of inducements in secret negotiations between Essendon and the AFL, including “an outstanding career development opportunity”, in exchange for dropping his own court action against the league. The University of Oxford was suggested, but the coach would later settle on the prestigious INSEAD business school in Fontainebleau, France for his sins.

Demetriou sealed his own fate when he boldly declared on 3AW radio that Hird was not being paid while serving his suspension.

“That is one thing I will go to my grave on: I know 100 per cent that the AFL is not paying (Hird) and I know that Essendon is not paying.”

He was flat out wrong and resigned in March 2014, handing the reins to his long-time deputy and deal maker, Gillon McLachlan.

Jobe Watson and teammates held a press conference after they had been suspended. Picture: Getty Images

Jobe Watson and teammates held a press conference after they had been suspended. Picture: Getty Images

THE PLAYERS ARE CHARGED

Despite assurances from AFL chiefs to Bombers bosses that the players would not face doping sanctions, in June 2014, ASADA issued 34 Dons with show cause notices.
Hird and Essendon launched an unsuccessful counter attack in the Federal Court questioning the legality of the joint ASADA-AFL probe, before the players were found not guilty by the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal after an 18-day hearing in March 2015.

Tribunal chairman David Jones declared that a three-man panel was not “comfortably satisfied” the 34 players had been administered the banned peptide Thymosin Beta-4.
But the verdict was short lived.


In January 2016, the ‘Essendon 34’ were slapped with 12-month bans by the Court of Arbitration for Sport on appeal, forcing the AFL Commission to strip skipper Jobe Watson of his 2012 Brownlow Medal.

The Dons fielded a team stacked with top-up players and duly secured the club’s first wooden spoon since 1933.

Dank received a lifetime ban, but, inexplicably, Robinson was never charged by the league or ASADA – and instead walked away with a $1 million payout after issuing Supreme Court subpoenas against Demetriou, McLachlan, Evans and Robson.

Robinson would later be cleared to work again in the NRL.
How the Herald Sun covered the story.
How the Herald Sun covered the story.

How the Herald Sun covered the story.

THE HUMAN TOLL

The scandal took its darkest turn a year later when Hird attempted to take his own life.

“From what I have observed over the past number of years, it seems that you can glass your partner, you can sleep with your best friend’s wife and the path to forgiveness will always be open in AFL land – but if your name is James Hird that path will be blocked,” Hird’s shattered lawyer, Steven Amendola, declared at the time.

Thompson’s life, too, spiralled into the abyss. His marriage collapsed and after police raids on his Port Melbourne apartment in 2018, he was convicted of drug possession and sentenced to a 12-month community corrections order.

As former AFL commissioner Peter Scanlon said of the devastating Essendon drugs scandal in the book The Boys’ Club: “I think they (the AFL) got caught out. They thought they could solve it in a much simpler way and underestimated the vehemence of ASADA”.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2

Log in to remove this ad.

"Dank received a lifetime ban, but, inexplicably, Robinson was never charged by the league or ASADA – and instead walked away with a $1 million payout after issuing Supreme Court subpoenas against Demetriou, McLachlan, Evans and Robson."

Who paid the $1m? From one to four of the above named knew the most unrevealed and interesting part to this whole story.
 
Peter Scanlon actually gets it. WADA is a psychopath. The correct course of action had the people involved had the character knowing that they were caught out though willful negligence at the very least was to sit down with WADA and ask for the best possible outcome as early as possible.

That's not hindsight the Bombers were aware of exactly what they were guilty of as soon as it hit the fan. It could have gone away in a couple of months.
 
Peter Scanlon actually gets it. WADA is a psychopath. The correct course of action had the people involved had the character knowing that they were caught out though willful negligence at the very least was to sit down with WADA and ask for the best possible outcome as early as possible.

That's not hindsight the Bombers were aware of exactly what they were guilty of as soon as it hit the fan. It could have gone away in a couple of months.

Cronulla were much better advised, and cut a deal very early on. Possibly because the NRL didn't believe they'd be able to sweep it all under the rug.

Essendon (and the AFL) thought they could, so they didn't.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Cronulla were much better advised, and cut a deal very early on. Possibly because the NRL didn't believe they'd be able to sweep it all under the rug.

Essendon (and the AFL) thought they could, so they didn't.
To be fair they almost did.

They managed to somehow get that 'independent' panel to clear them 2-1 before WADA stepped in.
 
To be fair they almost did.

They managed to somehow get that 'independent' panel to clear them 2-1 before WADA stepped in.

I know someone connected to that panel, as much as people think it was an AFL setup it wasn't. The panel reviewed the evidence as put before them under a different method to how WADA presented their case at CAS.

They've commented that had the case been presented to them under a strand in a cable approach, it was likely they'd reach the same conclusion.
 
I still find it amusing that one week Mark Robinson was celebrating breaking the story about the whole drug saga, then whinged, whined and tried to chastise the media for going on about the saga. He became quite a bigger nuffy during the entire thing.
 
I know someone connected to that panel, as much as people think it was an AFL setup it wasn't. The panel reviewed the evidence as put before them under a different method to how WADA presented their case at CAS.

They've commented that had the case been presented to them under a strand in a cable approach, it was likely they'd reach the same conclusion.
The approach used in AFL appointed panel was incorrect under the WADA code, hence the WADA appeal to CAS that was successful. The panel were badly advised and wrong people chosen.
 
The approach used in AFL appointed panel was incorrect under the WADA code, hence the WADA appeal to CAS that was successful. The panel were badly advised and wrong people chosen.


According to this (and, admittedly, it may not be the authoritative source) it was ASADA who opted to take that approach, not something decided upon or imposed by the panel.

12. ASADA picked ‘links in a chain’ to help persuade the AFL Tribunal: “ASADA, before the AFL Tribunal, relied exclusively on an analysis of links in a chain, which was accordingly reflected in the AFL Tribunal’s approach”: para 109 CAS Decision.

13. In other words, ASADA volunteered to prove its case by applying the more difficult test.

14. The AFL Tribunal, applying ‘links in a chain’ (as it had been asked to do by ASADA), declared it was not ‘comfortably satisfied’ of the first two facts below, meaning two indispensible links in the chain were missing such that it was unnecessary to consider the rest:

For posterity;

21. Caveat: It is unclear from the published material whether ASADA was encouraged by the AFL Tribunal to proceed with “links in a chain”, which might have impacted the forensic choice ASADA made.

I've never been convinced ASADA was particularly good at their job, and don't believe the WADA code is overly well suited to professional team sports, but do believe CAS reached approximately the right outcome given what we know.
 
Well done OP on the round up, clears up a few things I was fuzzy on.

McLachlan was Demetriou's protégé, as Dillon is McLachlan's, so the Boys Club is still in control at the AFL.

The link to Geelong was "de-emphasised" and blame shifted to Hird, who was a ninny but not a chemist. We're supposed to believe Robinson, Dank and Thompson were all angels in Geelong, and Darth Hird corrupted them once they arrived at Essendon?

It's a stinking mess and many, many people's careers hang on keeping the full story covered up.
 
I've never been convinced ASADA was particularly good at their job, and don't believe the WADA code is overly well suited to professional team sports, but do believe CAS reached approximately the right outcome given what we know.
The competency or rather lack there of ny ASADA is well known. WADA were unhappy with NRL deal as well, but because the deal involved all players admitting guilt, WADA appealing the deal done would've likely failed as penalty administered (even if very light)

ASADA & Australian sport have a terrible record of enforcing WADA code and properly discipling drug cheats. Just look at Willie Rioli, any other major sport thats a slam dunk 4 year ban.
 
Baker&McKenzie pty.ltd biggest international lawfirm in London Christine Lagarde ex executive chairperson to be foreign minister of france and then chief of IMF post StraussKahn Manhattan hotel room bedroom staff


- people are living too long voxpop blue-rinse but not a golden circle

London & Chicago not Skadden Arps
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top