smasha
It's Time!
Friendly mate.We agree to have polar opposite opinions. I know the liverpool game at the mcg was absolutely nothing like anfield
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Friendly mate.We agree to have polar opposite opinions. I know the liverpool game at the mcg was absolutely nothing like anfield
In ten years time we'll be back to 16 teams.
Giants would have folded and two Vic teams would have merged and relocated to Tasmania.
That's a gracious attitude from a fan of a club who's last president stated last year that the Swans were a couple of bad seasons from being a bankrupt anchor on the league.I'd go as far as saying 4 Vic teams will merge.
North will go under once this spending spree shows them up.
Recruiting washed up players & big money assistant coaches for one big shot at a p'ship.
Fail!
Northern Bulldogs..............very marketable!
Oh look!That's a gracious attitude from a fan of a club who's last president stated last year that the Swans were a couple of bad seasons from being a bankrupt anchor on the league.
In ten years time we'll be back to 16 teams.
Giants would have folded and two Vic teams would have merged and relocated to Tasmania.
Nothing another round cant fixOne less game a round means less money from broadcasters. As if the AFL will go for that.
I personally don't as I am not an immigrant or 1st genDo you actually find that statement offensive ?
All very well going on about the atmosphere at big a league games , but only other 20 something single males want to be in the active zones with their peers
I cant comment on what it was like to be there, but the tv concentrating on those areas will simply put off other demographics watching on TV.
And lets not forget victory were flavour of the month a few years back with large crowds but there were many smaller crowds in between, it could be another flash in the pan. Maybe those kids grow up and find a new flavour.
Afl is a family thing and quite unique. Hate to lose that trying to generate some faux atmosphere - im thinking of that liverpool v victory game....quite cringeworthy
Swans averaging a higher attendance than North despite not having the advantage of playing home games in VIC against VIC teams?Barely anyone cares about the Swans and even less care about the Giants. Gil is talking bollocks.
I think it's time to wind up the failed GWS experiment.
Spare me your conspiracy theories .Yeah, by scheduling Carlton vs Brisbane there.
It was so easy to replace a game into the date they supposedly were of the understanding the GF would be scheduled - May 10.
Too difficult to move the Bulldogs vs Freo game though on May 17.
AFL is bullshitting, yet some folks just lap it up because the AFL have never been disingenuous.
I like how the AFL have also scheduled a match at Olympic Park on the same weekend they thought the GF would be on - another possible GF venue if Wanderers make it. AFL use it 3 times a year and choose the weekend they thought the GF was on.
Spare me.
BTW, Swans fans don't like going to the Olympic Stadium for games. Listen to the fans.
So soccer crowds arent mainly single males ? I must be hallucinating
I know because i followed soccer in that age group, rarely been back since
Anyway I dont really care. Just concerned that AFL leaders try to develop a faux version of the A league at AFL because A league is jut a faux version of european soccer, even though we compete in asia and could develop our own 'atmosphere!
Good points Pessimistic.
There is a lot of copying with the a-league soccer with their European brethren. If the AFL matches can match soccer with the singing or drum banging or whatever then it rules out any potential advantage soccer could have. Then you are left with a game on game comparision and it is clear that the Australian game offers superior entertainment on the field.
I watched about 10 minutes of a soccer match on the tv last night and in one section the ball pops up and the defender came storming in from behind and I thought "oh ok now we are going to have a contest- one on one", but instead because they have next to no physical contact in this sport the guy just stood behind him and sort of blocked the space.
I know they have "tackles" where a guy slides in with his feet and steals the ball, but that to me isn't a contest one on one. That is just sliding whilst another guy is on his feet. It is at moments like this that you realise that the overall package of Australian football- physical contact, speed, skill, marks, long kicking etc - is far superior to soccer's package. Well it is in my view. Others may relish what soccer has to offer such as the long shots at goal.
Anyway, the singing thing. The Age writer the other day mentioned a special area set aside behind the goals for standing room. That makes sense, try and build a section for the young "cheer squad" crew. Give them a special membership "the Collingwood crew" etc. The problem is when to sing in footy? Scoring is different, the game is so fast in footy. Whoever is in front at half-time sings the club song? If you are up by 30 points in the last quarter sing the song? That happens every so often, but not that often. Why not? That Port Adelaide thing works pretty well. They have come up with a solution in an Australian context and not a "faux version" of something from overseas.
Bulldogs are the only team from the West. 3 teams from the north including 2 powerhouse clubs. I hope your not in Marketing. NO mergers. Recruiting 2 players isn't going to be the differance between a team surviving or not.I'd go as far as saying 4 Vic teams will merge.
North will go under once this spending spree shows them up.
Recruiting washed up players & big money assistant coaches for one big shot at a p'ship.
Fail!
Northern Bulldogs..............very marketable!
Swans averaging a higher attendance than North despite not having the advantage of playing home games in VIC against VIC teams?
Spare me your conspiracy theories .
It just proves you're talking crap because round 6 is GWS's first home game at Spotless due to the Easter Royal Show commitments and even if WSW (who have lost their first two games btw) make the A-league GF, the match will be played at Allianz next door to an empty SCG that weekend. Add to that there's no AFL game in Sydney on the Sunday. Funny how you conveniently left that piece of info out chasing a imaginary smoking gun .
The weekend of May 8-10 has 6 Saturday games. More than any other. So the AFL did free up that Sunday. The Carlton vs Brisbane game would be moved to the MCG if the FFA wanted May 10 again. Etihad management oppose moving AFL games to the MCG as they lose revenue and the AFL has a contractual agreement to play so many games at Etihad. However they would agree if the A-league GF was the replacement. Crowd-wise though the Carl vs Bris game is more suited to the 'smaller' Etihad so that would've been at late switch in the fixturing process to Etihad after the FFA said no to May 10. Moving fixtured games from the MCG to Etihad when only one venue is being used is something the AFL has done before at the last minute. They did it to Richmond when a Tiger official leaked to Caro info about scoring an extra MCG home game and the AFL moved that game to Etihad which wasn't being used that day.
The FFA have history when it comes to Etihad of telling the AFL one thing, to which the AFL agrees to, and then the FFA at a later date changes what they want expecting the AFL (and Etihad and Governments) to just fall in line. If the AFL doesn't then the FFA runs to the media sooking about it. I call that disingenuous. Add to that the FFA claimed in their public statement that they don't deal directly with other sporting bodies in relation to venue hire yet Melbourne Victory contacted the AFL about May 10 and the FFA itself contacted the AFL on October 21 about May 17 (albeit too late). Maybe you should critique what the FFA does and says as much as you do the AFL.
There's no doubting the AFL is looking after and protecting its interests but don't come here crying crocodile tears as the FFA only cares about its interests too in dealing with other codes. Sport is a business these days. In this case, the FFA stuffed up itself with the dates.
You really have no idea. Must be a perth thing...You have an entire city and still most people couldn't give a s**t. It's just the way things are.
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/sport/foo...758543439?nk=618aa9057e242aab92d747458f6dd3d0
AFL have history with this.
No need for the bullshit.
This, we are more chance of gaining clubs rather than loosing them, especially with the predicted growth of the country in the next 25 years..No way would the AFL lose clubs... TV rights say so, 9 games etc.
20 clubs is the long term plan for sure... "20 for 2020" would be a nice little campaign, but doubt the AFL will be ready to expand again in 5 years. 20 clubs/10 games sounds better than 18 clubs/9 games which just sounds a tad off.
Giants to Canberra. Bring in NT (games in Darwin/Alice) and Tasmania (game in Hobart/Launnie). Every state/territory represented.
Good points Pessimistic.
There is a lot of copying with the a-league soccer with their European brethren. If the AFL matches can match soccer with the singing or drum banging or whatever then it rules out any potential advantage soccer could have.