Roo Lives Again
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 22, 2012
- 6,349
- 6,065
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
- Banned
- #76
I'd probably have to rematch the entire game to find it and I can't assed using my bandwidth just for some debate on here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you need help visualising a punch to the head?
Go and look at the Vince v Danger video on AFL.com.au and listen to Dunstall and Roo talking about whats happening way off the ball and see the camera cutting to Vince holding Danger down, wrestling with him, putting his hands on Danger's neck etc all while the ball is long gone. If it was any other team they'd be whinge wing about their player as well. If that was happening to Pendlebury you'd be up in arms rather than this 'go watch netball' crap.
Cant really argue with this comment.. Infact its 100% on the mark.How about the 21 other Crows players out there do what every other team would have done and not let their superstar get bullied for three quarters of a game.
Cant really argue with this comment.. Infact its 100% on the mark.
Not sure what this has to do with a supposed elbow that nobody sawSomeone told me a story that Melbourne were good once....but it must've been a hell of a long time ago as I can't remember it!!!
I imagined the Demons won a game once...but I was imagining it
Damn I thought it was all a bad dreamRound 7 last year maybe?
From the Smart Replay.
Kent hitting Laird, 1st quarter, watch from the Free kick at 13:10.
Vince shoulders Sloane in the head, 3rd quarter, select behinds, and it's after the one at 16:36.
With the softening of the Tribunal this year, these may not have resulted in a charge, but I think both should have been "looked at" by the MRP.
Thanks for actually providing the incident. Please take note OP
First incident was assessed and the mrp found nothing in it. I'm biased, but to me it always looked like kent was trying to punch the ball out of Laird's hands, Laird lowered his body and the contact was incidental. It was probably reckless but since Laid wasn't hurt no charge.
2nd incident was clearly not intentional, attempting to shepard, clipped his chin, Sloane not hurt. Even Roo, an Adelaide board member said there was nothing wrong with it.
At what point is Adelaide going to move on from Vince's performance on the weekend?
The Kent one was not assessed. Where did you hear that?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-04-20/mrp-full-statement-round-three
And you can listen to Roo's comment, or Huddo's (?) comment right after which infers that Roo is kidding himself.
And I'm glad that "non-intentional clips to the chin" are no longer reportable offenses. I'll let the MRP know also. Should save them some time this year.
So you it wasn't an elbow like you claimed?From the Smart Replay.
Kent hitting Laird, 1st quarter, watch from the Free kick at 13:10.
Vince shoulders Sloane in the head, 3rd quarter, select behinds, and it's after the one at 16:36.
With the softening of the Tribunal this year, these may not have resulted in a charge, but I think both should have been "looked at" by the MRP.
So you it wasn't an elbow like you claimed?
So you it wasn't an elbow like you claimed?