Number of games played ladder for round 17

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

take out brent staker and adcock who had about 3 touches between them and we would be down to 1450
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

sticker,220x200-pad,220x200,ffffff.u3.png
 
JB said the Blues had 1500 games less experience than the HFC on Friday.
Going by this he was correct.

And, the OP should pump up the Doggies. They are doing well.
 
When Boomer Harvey retires, North's number of games will drop significantly, and they would fall back into pack somewhat leaving Hawthorn as the stand alone old codgers.
 
When Boomer Harvey retires, North's number of games will drop significantly, and they would fall back into pack somewhat leaving Hawthorn as the stand alone old codgers.
The goat old codgers has a good ring to it.

If any team should know that young and good can leave you with no silverware it's the dogs.
 
Interestingly, apart from Saints/Melbourne (too high) and Essendon/GC (too low) this looks a lot like most people's ladder predictions before the season started. Shows we're maybe all disproportionately influenced by the age/experience of lists.

Having said that, I would rather this was on the dogs board - not sure posting it on main board was a good idea OP.
 
If Fletcher retires then Essendon's list would become the least experienced.

Edit: Just realised Fletcher was not included anyway as he didn't play in rd 17.
 
Last edited:
There's not much to say.

Melbourne are more experienced than expected and West Coast could have a solid 4+ year window if they play their cards right. That's all I'm really taking away from this.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top