Cheers, yep he is where he shouldn't be, or very close to it, for sure! I recall an instance on the far wing Noble running past side of player/mark, no Ess player close by and thought, gee he must be close to the protected zone (likely would have been paid a few years ago...), so let's say both...
Front on contact, certainly could have been some I missed. Technical and annoying for sure, especially as all those paid in this game were so minor.
I just watched this a few times, no issue with ball up for me. He was tackled immediately and was attempting to dispose I feel. Yes he managed to...
Suggested other endeavours didn't pan out so I'm back to an umpiring review like round 1.
Round 1 there was some talk of bad umpiring and Geelong getting the advantage, not consensus opinion though. My review didn't show any major disadvantage to us.
This time though, seems an overwhelming...
Rather than just talk about a select few decisions, let’s discuss them all!
Or just move on to the Port preview thread, to each their own.
Q1
Geelong free – holding the man. Fair call.
Collingwood free – high contact in ruck contest. Stanley clumsy. Fair call.
Geelong free – Adams holding...
Yeah same, don't see much VFL. Some people talked him up perhaps too much leading to unrealistic expectations but I really think he can be a damaging, impactful HFF.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.