* this shambles of a club and incompetent, immoral disgrace of a board.
I've never been less enthused to support this club. And yes, that includes the saga.
There's a rivalry, but it doesn't really extend beyond bigfooty - despite some marketing team attempts to do so at times.
We have both been pretty s**t for a while, they used to always beat us, now we always beat them.
Because we started our run of beating them around the time of the ASADA...
Calling Saad a running back is really off the mark. He's a great defender also. Very sad to see him go.
Carlton are probably paying a little higher given Saad wasn't contracted, but it's fair value for Saad's skill. He will make them a better team easily.
Don't know the last time I posted on here, but when your gameplan involves passing the ball forward by hand to guys facing the wrong direction, under pressure from behind, then you've ****ed it up.
Can't put it on the players trying to make this s**t sandwich work. They're either massively...
Dea? Dea? Proving what?
Oh, just checked who the poster was...
Gleeson is about 3000 times better than Dea.
Dea is hard and a good mark, but he is a terrible ball watcher and sells his defensive mates into trouble.
Dea is likely to get moved on or get a one year deal.
Unfortunately Dea was at fault for almost half the goals Richmond scored.
He tends to ball watch a lot, and while he does some stuff well and had some good games for us I don't think he is ever going to lose that habit.
This whole sorry event shows the flaws of a tribunal system the focuses primarily on outcome and not action.
Outcome should be an extra penalty on top, not the basic determining factor.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.