12 Premiership players on the list

[cormick]

In an interview on SEN on Saturday before the match, Gary March, questioned by Dermie on whether or not the club had, as Hawthorn had done four years previous, rated who on the list currently "would be part of the next premiership". At the time they did theirs, the hawks had 15. March said something like "yeah we've done that, and we probably wouldn't have that many. We think we have around 12."

Who are the 12?

For mine: Thursfield
Deledio
Riewoldt
Cotchin
McGuane
Morton
Vickery
Tambling
Post
Nahas
Foley
Collins

Would this be on the mark for most?
Others include: Polak, Edwards, Polo, Newman, Rance, Putt, Tuck, JON, Pattison, Hislop, Thomson, Hughes, Connors & Graham.

 

[Spluff]

Tambling
Deledio
Cotchin
Collins
Edwards
Foley
Vickery
Jackson
Riewoldt
Morton
Nahas
Thursfield
Post

Question marks over McGuane, Browne/Graham, Polo, Thomson

 

[cormick]

Oh yeah, forgot about Jackson.
Nah, **** him, he can be the 13th player.

 

[coke_zero]

seems everyone has jumped off the Moore bandwagon, hopefully regains some form for next year.

 

[cormick]

I know it's hyocritical of me, but I put him as "too old". I put Tuck in because he's proven to be durable. It's in his genetics!

 

[007Tigers]

garry march is stupid in saying that

we dont have that bad of a list we just need someone to develop them

personally i reckon more than 12 of our current players will be partof our next premiership

 

[_RT_]

For mine:

Thursfield
Deledio
Riewoldt
Cotchin
McGuane
Jackson
Vickery
Tambling
Post
Nahas
Foley
Collins

 

[beaver fever]

JON as others included? Cormick you are ****ing kidding me.

 

[one eyedtiger]

Cotchin
Deledio
Vickery
Post
Jack
Morton
Tambling
Foley
Collins
Nahas
Jackson
McGuane

Polo and Graham would be there too.

 

[coke_zero]

JON as others included? Cormick you are ****ing kidding me.

anything can happen in footy. if he improves on some things over summer he could become a real good player for us.

 

[Rimmer]

It is not very encouraging by the club president ... I wonder whether he includes himself among the Richmond people at the time of our next premiership ...

 

[beaver fever]

anything can happen in footy. if he improves on some things over summer he could become a real good player for us.

How about no ya dutch freak.

 

[coke_zero]

How about no ya dutch freak.

how about you suck a fat one.

 

[beaver fever]

how about you suck a fat one.

So not yours then.

 

[carn tigez]

I don't buy into all this "list" rubbish. There are a few exceptions (players you know will or won't make it either way) but a list is only as good as it plays.

Look at the Saints for example; they have a number of players who you wouldn't think are good enough to be in a premiership, but being a champion team is a lot more important than being a team of champions.

And it's very hard to rate individual players when they have been thrown around in positions, playing in a losing side and under incompetent coach(es). Players like Newman, Edwards, Polo, Graham, even Hislop, are capable of playing a role in a winning side. It's just about finding that role for them.

The Pies don't have a very good list IMO. The players by themselves under a different coach would struggle. As a unit under Malthouse, they dominate. It's all about finding a player's role and making sure they stick to it.

 

[coke_zero]

So not yours then.

no not mine, mine is normal. you have a short stumpy one though. so you can suck that.

 

[beaver fever]

no not mine, mine is normal. you have a short stumpy one though. so you can suck that.

So you have a run of the mill 6 incher? Ah well could be worse.

 

[cormick]

Suprised you only picked me up on JON, Beaver.

 

[richoatthedisco]

I don't buy into all this "list" rubbish. There are a few exceptions (players you know will or won't make it either way) but a list is only as good as it plays.

Look at the Saints for example; they have a number of players who you wouldn't think are good enough to be in a premiership, but being a champion team is a lot more important than being a team of champions.

And it's very hard to rate individual players when they have been thrown around in positions, playing in a losing side and under incompetent coach(es). Players like Newman, Edwards, Polo, Graham, even Hislop, are capable of playing a role in a winning side. It's just about finding that role for them.

The Pies don't have a very good list IMO.

I was with you til here. "Malthouse gets the best out of an average Collingwood list" is one of the most inaccurate cliches in footy. Didak is a brilliant player, so is Davis, so is Shaw, so is Thomas at times. Swan is Brownlow favourite, Cloke is one of the top 10 key forwards in the league, Presti is rarely beaten, Pendlebury is all class, Lockyer has been a good footballer for 10 years. Beams is a young star, as is Nathan Brown. Medhurst can win/turn games and O'Brien, O'Bree and Maxwell are underrated role players.

Anyway, enough about Collingwood. We hate those *****.

How big's your **** bagger fagger?

 

[coke_zero]

So you have a run of the mill 6 incher? Ah well could be worse.

i said fat wise.

 

[Foleys Footy]

Thursfield
McGuane
Cotchin
Riewoldt
Deledio
Foley
Newman
Tambling
Post
Vickery
Polo
Morton

I would add Jackson but after Raines in '06 and Moore last year (although that may be a little harsh)..im wary of one year wonders. So we'll see...

 

[Barnzy]

How about no ya dutch freak.

It's 'ya dutch bastard'.

Good movie though.

 

[mitch richmond]

I know it's hyocritical of me, but I put him as "too old". I put Tuck in because he's proven to be durable. It's in his genetics!

A good list you put together there. Would have Graham in there. Jackson might have better genes than Tuck, who'd know?

 

[beaver fever]

i said fat wise.

So you have a run of the mill whatever the **** is the average. Ah well could be worse.

 

[Mario Speedwagon]

Get a room....