Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Totally agree. Has upsideOliver may look a bit chubby etc but once he exchanges that for muscle he'll be a beast.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
As a club you are always hoping players turn into what they hope. So this player isn't any different than saying we hope Ah Chee turns into a Rioli type player. Either or really. For me what do we see as the most important issue right now? Is it another inside mid bull type, or a small mercurial small fwd? Imo we need both, but when we lose, we get hammered in the middle, so imo pick the best insider and if that is Oliver so be it.I think your hoping he may turn into something that he may not.Alot easier to dominate at junior level when your his size.
Would you believe 2 oranges and a apple?I find that hard to believe
Oliver may look a bit chubby etc but once he exchanges that for muscle he'll be a beast.
Gaff?![]()
Reckon Melbourne bids on Mills & Hopper at 3 meaning taking Curnow at effectively 5. If the Swans/Giants don't match they get a gun, if they do match it's not that much of a reach then.Brett Anderson saying Curnow to Melbourne at 3. Which for mine makes little sense considering they traded for it and he would likely be around at 7.
Anderson thinks that Parish will go 4/5 and Oliver at 6. So id say based purely on that:
1. Weitering
2. Scache
3. Curnow
4. Parish
5. Weiderman
6. Oliver.
Obviously thats not taking into account bids.
Brett Anderson saying Curnow to Melbourne at 3. Which for mine makes little sense considering they traded for it and he would likely be around at 7.
Anderson thinks that Parish will go 4/5 and Oliver at 6. So id say based purely on that:
1. Weitering
2. Scache
3. Curnow
4. Parish
5. Weiderman
6. Oliver.
Obviously thats not taking into account bids.
Or slowOliver may look a bit chubby etc but once he exchanges that for muscle he'll be a beast.
Oliver will be long gone before our pick.
Ah chee and Oliver getting talked about a lot on this thread.
Some believe Oliver wont slip as far as 12, some say he will. I think most believe ah chee will still be there at 12
My question is, if Oliver is snapped up is prior to us, would Ah chee be our most likely target at 12?
In any case, going off last years draft cellis at 12 was a master stroke and I have faith in the clubs decision
1) McCartin
2) petreca
3) brayshaw
4) Pickett
5) de goey
6) martchbank
7) ahern
8) Wright
9) Moore
10) Cockatoo
11) duggan
12) Ellis
Obviously Sydney getting Heeney was nothing short of highway robbery but I'm pretty happy with CEllis
Gaff?![]()
Am.verry happy with Ellis, only injury has curtailed a more promising startTrue but I still wish West Coast didn't get Duggan before our pick.
No , I have been tracking him for a long time , 4-5 years and well before others jumped aboard. Back to when he was a snotty nosed kid who relied heavily upon his athletic ability .I think your hoping he may turn into something that he may not.Alot easier to dominate at junior level when your his size.
I kind of agree with you now re: Collingwood bias. I tested him to see how he would rate all the AFL clubs drafting and I think he got the list pretty good with Geel, WB near the top but to have Collingwood number 1 is pretty weird, I can't see how you could justify that they have drafted better than WB.He is alright and his writes ups are very good and in depth.
But personally i use it as a tool like any other to help me form my own opinion. I really only watch champs and maybe a TAC game in the year and usually GF (i didn't this year) so it helps to get a feel of players abilities, progress and potential. What you have to remember when using his mock drafts is that Collingwood influences him way too easy and its why IMO he'll never be a scout (which is what i assume he wants given his level of detail). And take that into consideration when judging players.
But he does get a bit right, for example he was huge on BEllis in his year when most weren't.
So was Dangerfield when first draftedYou reckon this looks physically developed?
![]()
Long way to go IMO
Will take MileraThere’s talk GC are very keen and that’s why they moved from 3 to 6 in the draft