Righto drafters - now we are starting to get some meat in these questions.
So, I'd like us to achieve a consensus view on how we vote/judge teams at the end of the draft.
I'm fairly committed to voting and then have a head to head match ups for 'finals' as we've done in the past.
What we need to agree is the following:
- method by which we score and rank the sides to get a 1-18 list.
- whether any of that method will carry through to the end of season rankings.
OPTION1 - Previous JUDGING CRITERIA, no Impact on End of Season rankings
Rank each team by the categories below
Structure - 15pts. Does this work as an actual side?
Midfield Overall Talent - 5pts.
Inside Midfielders - 10pts.
Outside midfielders - 10pts.
Tall Forwards, inc third tall option - 10pts.
Small and Midsized Forwards - 10pts.
Does the team work structurally, and can they kick a winning score? Do they have multiple options, as well as strong key forward to hold it together?
Tall Defenders, inc third tall option - 10pts.
Small and Midsized Forwards - 10pts.
Do they have the options to stop a range of different forward lines?
Rucks - 10pts. Feel free to rate this slightly higher, but I only gave it five as it is only a player or two across your whole squad.
X-factor - 5pts. Does Bruce think they're special?
Experience - 5pts. Are they mature bodies, ready to win now?
OPTION2 - Carls Proposed CRITERIA, no Impact on End of Seaon
Preseason
At the end of the draft, we vote on the structure and balance of each line up in a similar way to what we do now:
Forward line (out of 15)
- 6 points; Aerial prowess (eg goals via contested marking, leading)
- 6 points; Ground level (eg goals via crumbing, goal sense)
- 3 points; Defensive pressure (tackling, speed)
Midfield (out of 20)
- 6 points; Inside skills (contested ball, clearances, tackling)
- 6 points; Outside skills (spread, speed, skill level)
- 6 points; Midfield depth (number & quality of players who can rotate through midfield)
- 2 points; Tagging (shut down ability)
Ruck (out of 10)
- 4 points; Tap work (hit outs to advantage in all ruck contests)
- 4 points; Around the ground (marking, pushing forward, dropping back)
- 2 points; Ruck cover (secondary ruckman)
Defence (out of 15)
- 6 points; Aerial prowess (marking contests, spoils, intercept marks)
- 6 points; Ground level (shut down skills)
- 3 points; Rebound (run and carry, kicking penetration)
This voting should be less about predictions of how teams will perform in the season ahead (too subjective). It should be more how they are rated at that point in time. All players vote on each team and each team gets a score out of 60. This gives us a ranking from 1st to 18th on the balance and structure of each line up.
I mentioned this previously but I think the 'prize' on offer should be a quotient that your final post season total is multiplied by. Eg 0.01 difference between each placing, 1.09 for the winner, 0.92 for the lowest ranked player.
OPTION3 - Previous Judging CRITERIA, with Impact on End of Seaon
The Impact on end of season we can debate - but arguably could simply be the 'structure' score out of 15 applied.
Or we can massage the details a bit - I would be taking suggestions.
If you vote Option 3 - please provide suggestions.
OPTION4 - Carls Proposed CRITERIA, with Impact on End of Seaon
Car'ls proposal including the flow on affect to the end of season.
(though I won't be rewarding just goals - ever).
Kristof
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
hdecure
Bacon8
Footypie32
FAITH
Stripple
Danoz
AdelaideFan14
hendo8888
roo2macca
Freddy Bassett
BACCS
deaneus
spexau
Danger in Texas
So, I'd like us to achieve a consensus view on how we vote/judge teams at the end of the draft.
I'm fairly committed to voting and then have a head to head match ups for 'finals' as we've done in the past.
What we need to agree is the following:
- method by which we score and rank the sides to get a 1-18 list.
- whether any of that method will carry through to the end of season rankings.
OPTION1 - Previous JUDGING CRITERIA, no Impact on End of Season rankings
Rank each team by the categories below
Structure - 15pts. Does this work as an actual side?
Midfield Overall Talent - 5pts.
Inside Midfielders - 10pts.
Outside midfielders - 10pts.
Tall Forwards, inc third tall option - 10pts.
Small and Midsized Forwards - 10pts.
Does the team work structurally, and can they kick a winning score? Do they have multiple options, as well as strong key forward to hold it together?
Tall Defenders, inc third tall option - 10pts.
Small and Midsized Forwards - 10pts.
Do they have the options to stop a range of different forward lines?
Rucks - 10pts. Feel free to rate this slightly higher, but I only gave it five as it is only a player or two across your whole squad.
X-factor - 5pts. Does Bruce think they're special?
Experience - 5pts. Are they mature bodies, ready to win now?
OPTION2 - Carls Proposed CRITERIA, no Impact on End of Seaon
Preseason
At the end of the draft, we vote on the structure and balance of each line up in a similar way to what we do now:
Forward line (out of 15)
- 6 points; Aerial prowess (eg goals via contested marking, leading)
- 6 points; Ground level (eg goals via crumbing, goal sense)
- 3 points; Defensive pressure (tackling, speed)
Midfield (out of 20)
- 6 points; Inside skills (contested ball, clearances, tackling)
- 6 points; Outside skills (spread, speed, skill level)
- 6 points; Midfield depth (number & quality of players who can rotate through midfield)
- 2 points; Tagging (shut down ability)
Ruck (out of 10)
- 4 points; Tap work (hit outs to advantage in all ruck contests)
- 4 points; Around the ground (marking, pushing forward, dropping back)
- 2 points; Ruck cover (secondary ruckman)
Defence (out of 15)
- 6 points; Aerial prowess (marking contests, spoils, intercept marks)
- 6 points; Ground level (shut down skills)
- 3 points; Rebound (run and carry, kicking penetration)
This voting should be less about predictions of how teams will perform in the season ahead (too subjective). It should be more how they are rated at that point in time. All players vote on each team and each team gets a score out of 60. This gives us a ranking from 1st to 18th on the balance and structure of each line up.
I mentioned this previously but I think the 'prize' on offer should be a quotient that your final post season total is multiplied by. Eg 0.01 difference between each placing, 1.09 for the winner, 0.92 for the lowest ranked player.
OPTION3 - Previous Judging CRITERIA, with Impact on End of Seaon
The Impact on end of season we can debate - but arguably could simply be the 'structure' score out of 15 applied.
Or we can massage the details a bit - I would be taking suggestions.
If you vote Option 3 - please provide suggestions.
OPTION4 - Carls Proposed CRITERIA, with Impact on End of Seaon
Car'ls proposal including the flow on affect to the end of season.
(though I won't be rewarding just goals - ever).
Kristof
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
hdecure
Bacon8
Footypie32
FAITH
Stripple
Danoz
AdelaideFan14
hendo8888
roo2macca
Freddy Bassett
BACCS
deaneus
spexau
Danger in Texas
