- Moderator
- #251
Australia v New Zealand in half an hour in the Rugby.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that to get into the gold medal match?Australia v New Zealand in half an hour in the Rugby.
yep. a semi.Is that to get into the gold medal match?
showing now. i watched the steam.Did they show the keirin?
Initially I wasn't too fussed with the coverage, but last night it became ludicrous. Fortunately the footy was on for most of the night, but after that - Thank God fo IQ. It's times like this the cost of Foxtel makes it worth while. Fast tracking the ads is the only way to maintain one's sanity.
It's one hell of a spoiler.
Does anyone, anywhere, understand the Kierin?
It does seem a little odd to have a normal 1-on-1 sprint and a keirin event (which is just a mass sprint). Certainly track cycling suffers from a fair bit of duplication in the final product (they are mostly just sprints - even the 25k scratch race is just 'Hang around until the end, slipstream and then sprint'). The keirin is spectacular (that's tv-ratings code for 'the event most likely to have a crash').
Then there's a team sprint - then a sprint time trial. And it's the same riders who do most of them.
It does seem a little odd to have a normal 1-on-1 sprint and a keirin event (which is just a mass sprint). Certainly track cycling suffers from a fair bit of duplication in the final product (they are mostly just sprints - even the 25k scratch race is just 'Hang around until the end, slipstream and then sprint'). The keirin is spectacular (that's tv-ratings code for 'the event most likely to have a crash').
Then there's a team sprint - then a sprint time trial. And it's the same riders who do most of them.
Great final well done South Africa for being the first team to beat New Zealand in Commonwealth games sevens.
It's why I don't pay much attention to the medal count...Not all gold medals are created equal.
e.g. Why is a 100m swim so different to a 50, or a 200? Gymnastics tends to have the same people get bucketloads (and usually in the same day), but a marathon, or a hockey tournament are still only worth 1.
Its why its is interesting to do an adjusted medals table. Count 1 basketball medal as 12 not 1. A hockey medal as 16 not 1. A soccer medal as 20 not 1 etc.
If anything - at Olympic level is shows the true domination of the USA as they regularly have had 9 or 10 teams in the 14 teams events ie Men + Women over 7 disciplines or 8 if you separated baseball from softball. The yanks would generally win 5 medals and usually 3 or 4 were gold.
If you look at Oz's performance between 1996 and 2008 when you did this adjusted table one year we out ranked the Russians and except for Beijing outranked the Chinese. 1996 we jumped from 9th on the medals table to 4th on my adjusted total as we won medals in 4 team events. But it helped that we had a team in just about every team sport as Oceania's representative.
Netballs probably another one that would be the best of the best at the commonwealth games as well.The whole point of the Olympics is to spread the sports around so each continent has some sports they are good in. If they don't have appeal to around 100 countries around at least 4 of the 6 continents then they wont get in.
Judo only got in - in 1964 because of Tokyo hosting and it was big in Asia. Taekwondo is only in the Olympics because its predominately an Asian sport the Seoul Olympics and the dodgy IOC vice president and ex Korean CIA operative Mickey Kim got the version of Taekwondo was president of the International Federation. Beach Volleyball only came in for TV and Golf came in because of the $$$ associated with the sport.
I have no real idea about what is going in handball around the world but every 4 years I enjoy watching the sport. Same with volleyball. Nobody equally likes 26 sports over 39 disciplines and the same all round the world.
The Comm Games suffers from lack of depth in many sports. I don't see it as some world games - but in the odd event it is world class and half the field are the best few in the world. Rugby 7's is dominated by Commonwealth countries. Only the French aren't there of who would likely win a gold medal in Rio. So its a competition worth watching in terms of world class as opposed to the wrestling where athletes from the commonwealth wins bugger all medals.
To be fair, the Kookaburras thrashed everybody at the World Cup as well.For Hockey, comm games is probably close to 50% of a world cup/Olympics in terms of competitiveness....Germany and Netherlands are missing, and to a lesser degree, Spain and Argentina, but they have Aus, NZ, ENG (+India).
Watching the thrashings of the lower ranked teams shows just how quickly the standard drops off however.
To be fair, the Kookaburras thrashed everybody at the World Cup as well.
Spot on. Absolutely dismantled the Dutch in the final, and cruised through the rest of it.To be fair, the Kookaburras thrashed everybody at the World Cup as well.
Spot on. Absolutely dismantled the Dutch in the final, and cruised through the rest of it.
They opened at $1.30 to win the comm games btw. Ridiculous considering that (if my memory serves correct) we've won every com games gold medal since the sport was inducted in 1998, played 25 matches with only 1 loss (to South Africa) and scored an incredible 125 goals.
But yet, no media coverage. Understand the sport is still amateur, but bloody hell, the most successful aus sporting team in history? Give us some more footage!
IPL was overdue, it's the national sport next to cricket. We'll never be able to provide the market over here to accommodate a national competition with a decent wage structure. But the local Victorian comp has a few clubs who will pay a decent enough player.It's actually pro (at the top levels anyway). Dutch have been for a while and the Indian set up an IPL style league recently.