Vic Daniel Andrews Retires, Undefeated

Remove this Banner Ad

Saint

Norm Smith Medallist
Feb 1, 2006
9,383
16,804
Victoria
AFL Club
Essendon
Continued From Part 5:


Continued from part 6:

Continued from part 7:
 
In public housing
If we had enough public housing there wouldn’t be a problem. So what does the state government do? Demolishes a public housing block in Port Melbourne and builds a mixture of private and public housing…
 
If we had enough public housing there wouldn’t be a problem. So what does the state government do? Demolishes a public housing block in Port Melbourne and builds a mixture of private and public housing…
Neither major party is funding or building public housing.

It's almost like making housing an investment asset created a conflict of interest.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Except the policy is literally about fossil fuels and decreasing our dependence on them.

Yes a good example of evidence based policy. e.g.:

F2FWoZ7aAAAj3BW
 
So who buys these houses off the owners / landlords?
Judging by what is happening in the eastern suburbs, foreigners (residing overseas) who can afford the highest costs will buy them and just rent them to foreign students happy to stay 12 to a house.

We need to build more houses, crack down on excessive rent increases, tax airbnb and vacant properties more, cut immigration and ban foreign ownership of residential property or land.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
cut immigration
The lack of skilled labour is one of the main issues facing the construction sector, especially residential home construction - causing large delays in construction times and skyrocketing construction costs. This was exacerbated by the sharp drop in immigration during the covid years and will take many years to redress.

The current Government's commitment to Increasing targeted immigration has the overwhelming support of business groups and the construction sector:

 
The lack of skilled labour is one of the main issues facing the construction sector, especially residential home construction - causing large delays in construction times and skyrocketing construction costs. This was exacerbated by the sharp drop in immigration during the covid years and will take many years to redress.

The current Government's commitment to Increasing targeted immigration has the overwhelming support of business groups and the construction sector:

We can cut immigration in areas we don't need. Not all of the 300000 plus temporary (many of whom wont leave) and permanent arrivals are skilled. This is only one part of the solution needed but is the easiest and quickest win.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Doesn't that make perfect sense though? There are more houses.
Thats the point - smaller household sizes and increased demand for new gas connections means an increasing investment in infrastructure for the production of a damaging fossil fuel at a time when as a state and a nation we are seeking a reduction in greenhouse gases.

Put simply Australia needs to get off natural gas if it is to have any hope of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Banning gas connections in new homes built from 2024 is consistent with Federal climate change commitments and is supported by both the Master Builders Association and the Property Council of Australia, whose national policy director said the ban on gas connections provided certainty to the industry as it moves towards “zero-carbon-ready buildings”.

“Every new building built with gas will need to be retrofitted in the future, so we welcome this move from the Victorian government to avoid investment in new gas network infrastructure and focus on reducing energy bills, and providing cleaner, healthier homes for Victorians,” she said.
 
I take offence to this post landlords provide a service if there were no landlords where do people who can’t afford to buy live?

If landlords believe they're making a positive contribution to society through their practices, it's as distasteful as it sounds. The mere use of the term "lord" should indicate how outdated and inappropriate this feudalistic concept truly is.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So who buys these houses off the owners / landlords?

In a hypothetical scenario without landlords, the system of housing would need to be fundamentally different. Options could include increased homeowner occupancy, cooperative housing, or public housing initiatives.

As for who would purchase the properties from the current owners or landlords, it could be the tenants themselves, community housing organizations, the government or a combination thereof.
 
i guess ur right, without landlords there would be absolutely 0 houses all throughout australia and the world, right?
3.25 million rental properties in Australia. That’s not insignificant

And, ATO data shows 2.22 million taxpayers are property investors in Australia, and most have done so either as part of SMSF’s or in addition to super.
 
3.25 million rental properties in Australia. That’s not insignificant

And, ATO data shows 2.22 million taxpayers are property investors in Australia, and most have done so either as part of SMSF’s or in addition to super.

Weird hey. We've got more landlords than ever before, yet homelessness keeps rising.

Do you think these things might be linked?
 
Houses don't dissolve if they aren't owned by an investor.
Agree, but unfair to blame “landlords” for Unaffordability.

Also, you will never have a 100% owner occupied housing market because there will always be people who need to rent for one reason or another

 
Weird hey. We've got more landlords than ever before, yet homelessness keeps rising.

Do you think these things might be linked?

You tell me. You must have read something on Twitter.

How many migrants moved to Melbourne in the past decade? Why have public housing levels declined in Australia by 12% over the past decade?
 
3.25 million rental properties in Australia. That’s not insignificant

And, ATO data shows 2.22 million taxpayers are property investors in Australia, and most have done so either as part of SMSF’s or in addition to super.
yeah have you tried getting a rental property in the past decade though lol, better to move out to the sticks like pakenham or officer (which first home buyers will soon be priced out of) for a chance of owning some shitty flat. i have no patience for landlords because every place i've rented at has been a nightmare because they oversee 10-15 different shitty properties and don't keep them up to quality.

if all the landlords disappeared overnight, what would happen to the australian housing market?
 
if all the landlords disappeared overnight, what would happen to the australian housing market?
That’s a hypothetical question that will NEVER happen. A bit like asking what if every house was owner occupied
 
That’s a hypothetical question that will NEVER happen. A bit like asking what if every house was owner occupied
yeah but i'm interested in your response to the question lol. i can't think of any downside that'd exist if every single landlord disappeared at the start of august
 
Agree, but unfair to blame “landlords” for Unaffordability.

Also, you will never have a 100% owner occupied housing market because there will always be people who need to rent for one reason or another


Unfair to blame landlords for unaffordability.

Seriously?
 
Last edited:
Unfair to blame landlords for unaffordability.

Seriously?
Absolutely. Explain how Australia’s unaffordable house pricing can be laid at the feet of landlords, and not other factors like sustained low interest rates over more than a decade until 2023, tax policies, immigration impact on population, supply and demand etc. This will be good.

And for once, this isn't necessarily a Labor v LNP argument, although you'll try and make it so.

While you’re at, explain why the Andrews government is selling public housing and not replacing it? Public housing is down almost 13% over the past decade.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top