Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think things started going downhill with the Button Plan.FTA's have actually been bad for Australia historically. Our industries have suffered without tariffs.
Pretty good performance by the PM. Of course it helps to not have the opposition sneering nicknames like "kevin707".
I was thinking that personally, Abbott is about 100 times more likeable than howard was as a public persona
Anyone hear the Radio National interview where the guy said Japan has told their farmers they are going to introduce quotas and subsidies?
I wouldn't hold my breath. I doubt we will see any perceptible benefits from these agreements within the next 5 years, if ever.Pretty good performance by the PM. Of course it helps to not have the opposition sneering nicknames like "kevin707".
I was thinking that personally, Abbott is about 100 times more likeable than Howard was as a public persona
I wouldn't hold my breath. I doubt we will see any perceptible benefits from these agreements within the next 5 years, if ever.
This has been the ongoing story of FTA in Australia. We agree to allowing greater market access to big players and end up getting sweet FA in return, despite all of the talk, promises and distant "commitments".
It also appears Abbott accepted significantly watered down agreements just to get his name in the paper.
Which is exactly what didn't happen.Youd have to say he would be absolutely brilliant to wrap up three trade deals with three seperate asian tiger economies to our satisfaction in the same year never mind during the same trip
Padbury said it had been working closely with major Korean engineering firms about the construction phase of the project, which has a $US6 billion budget, but did not give a timeline.
"The Australia-Korea Free Trade Agreement recently signed by the Prime Minister, has opened the door to greater investment and trade opportunities being created between Korean and Australian companies," Padbury said.
If by some miracle Oakajee goes ahead it does need plenty of foreign investment. It will be great for WA and great for the Mid West if it does happen though.
If we need the Koreans to do it then so be it.
Padbury boss Gary Stokes told Fairfax Media he was in Korea this morning and said the money was coming from an "invisible investor" who is a "wealthy Australian".
Mr Stokes would not name the "wealthy Australian", who has apparently sought to remain anonymous.
But he said the "wealthy Australian" had helped to source the money through banks, and that the $6 billion equity deal was 100 per cent confirmed on Tuesday night.
I know this if OT, but did you see this:
http://www.watoday.com.au/business/...dburys-6b-oakajee-revival-20140411-36h8u.html
Gina or Clive?
but Hancock Prospecting - which is the major partner in Roy Hill - has today confirmed that it has no involvement with Padbury's claimed deal.
This should be the Australian response to the TPP, sadly most people don't even know or care.
Because many of our industries were s**t, they made crappy products at expensive prices. Our good industries have continued.FTA's have actually been bad for Australia historically. Our industries have suffered without tariffs.
So, your argument is we should have 150% tarriffs on clothes so they cost twice as much and we can still make them here?? How is that better for the 99% of Australians that don't work in clothing manufacturing??I think things started going downhill with the Button Plan.
IMO FT agreements don't do much for the economy or the majority of Australia.
We have lost so many manufacturing industries -whitegoods(NZ still makes them), clothing, footwear, small appliances and of course MV.
Some of you will point out that our wage system is the problem but I would disagree. Last week, Rivers was advertising clothing for children - nothing over $5! Now most companies/stores operate on min of 100% profit.
These garments are made in Sri Lanka or Thailand, import duty is 10%, add freight, plus agent costs, then plus 10% GST, you can imagine the original cost paid by these companies.
Is this the wage conditions you expect. Workers here to be paid?
Because many of our industries were s**t, they made crappy products at expensive prices. Our good industries have continued.
So, your argument is we should have 150% tarriffs on clothes so they cost twice as much and we can still make them here?? How is that better for the 99% of Australians that don't work in clothing manufacturing??
That was just an estimate of how much higher t-shirts from Bangladesh would need to be to make us competitive with them.Where did you pluck 150% from?
That was just an estimate of how much higher t-shirts from Bangladesh would need to be to make us competitive with them.
You're the one arguing for tariffs, so how high should they be?
Then why don't we? And why are we afraid of the FTA?Don't wear T-Shirts for one thing, especially one that is made in Bangladesh and can cost under 50 cents to make.
I don't know what the tariff should be but I don't believe that FTA help the majority of Australians.
You seem to imply that we cannot make affordable clothing, I don't believe that is the case.
Then why don't we? And why are we afraid of the FTA?
Well they benefit most Australians directly, as we don't have to pay as much for goods. That is the whole point of an FTA, it allows us to specialise in what we're good at and export those goods overseas, while allowing us to import in goods from overseas at prices as low as we can.No afraid, don't know where you get this from, concerned, yes.
If you can show me how FTA's benefit the majority of Australians and not those that are either in Agriculture, Mining/Resources/Meat, happy to read what you have to say.
Well they benefit most Australians directly, as we don't have to pay as much for goods. That is the whole point of an FTA, it allows us to specialise in what we're good at and export those goods overseas, while allowing us to import in goods from overseas at prices as low as we can.
The only people tariffs help are those working in protected industries, everyone else is damaged by tariffs due to the lower choice and higher prices that come with protected industries.