GWS fined for inaccurate ASADA paperwork

[Crankyhawk]

Cylon hates AFL full stop, biggest chips on each shoulder I've ever seen.

What she has stated on other threads would be a reason to hate afl administration - from her side of story only.

 

[IanW]

We're not taking all your premiership points away...

I'm happy for it to be eight points, if we get to play Carlton twice

 

[Randomizor]

A bit confused. How many top up players do GWS get for this?

 

[DapperJong]

A bit confused. How many top up players do GWS get for this?

Ryan Griffen
Callan Ward
Shane Mumford
few others

 

[HirdsTheWord]

We're not taking all your premiership points away...



Hey hey hey! Maybe they are just going after the money? After all, GWS didn't get an infraction as part of the Essendon program!

Don't you have some hatred of Hal Hunter to go on with elsewhere?

I don't hate hal hunter

I just think his money grabbing attempt was pathetic.

 

[CatFan79]

I don't hate hal hunter

I just think his money grabbing attempt was pathetic.

The bloke wants to know what he was injected with, Essendon can't tell him.

You'd think shredding evidence would be a great idea, not all the time.

BTW Tim Watson disagrees with you.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

The bloke wants to know what he was injected with, Essendon can't tell him.

You'd think shredding evidence would be a great idea, not all the time.

BTW Tim Watson disagrees with you.

Prove they "shredded evidence"

 

[Taylor]

Prove they "shredded evidence"

Which side of the ledger would be best?

1 - Essendon knew what they injected but destroyed records
2 - Essendon didn't know what they injected their players with

One of them is gross negligence, the other is systematic administration negligence.

 

[CatFan79]

Prove they "shredded evidence"

Typical response from the guilty, and totally expected.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Typical response from the guilty, and totally expected.

so what you are saying is you are allowed to make outlandish statements but when I ask you to prove it its a typical "guilty" response?

Seems about right.

 

[Taylor]

so what you are saying is you are allowed to make outlandish statements but when I ask you to prove it its a typical "guilty" response?

Seems about right.

Prove what was injected.

That requirement takes priority over any other.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Prove what was injected.

That requirement takes priority over any other.

im not saying I can prove it or Essendon can prove it not I have ever said it. Pretty sure that's why we are in this situation

what is your basis for asking me this crap

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Which side of the ledger would be best?

1 - Essendon knew what they injected but destroyed records
2 - Essendon didn't know what they injected their players with

One of them is gross negligence, the other is systematic administration negligence.

3 - Essendon kept records and handed them to ASADA as requested.

 

[Taylor]

3 - Essendon kept records and handed them to ASADA as requested.

Absolutely

That will come out tomorrow and this can all go away.

 

[Taylor]

im not saying I can prove it or Essendon can prove it not I have ever said it. Pretty sure that's why we are in this situation

what is your basis for asking me this crap

You claimed that a guy who was injected by his employer with something they either can't or won't disclose to him and he wants to ensure that any medical results are covered by those who caused it, which will be tested in court, was a pathetic money grab.

Employer negligence is a big deal to me.

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Absolutely

That will come out tomorrow and this can all go away.

Nothing will come out tomorrow. This has years left.

 

[LoungeLizard]

3 - Essendon kept records and handed them to ASADA as requested.

So surely they can tell Hal what he was given then, why are they holding back?