Unsolved Madeleine McCann

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Academic? pmsl, shall I post the question you asked Tony back in 2010?
Is that you ShuBob?

Is Tony going to send cannon fodder in and stay back in Field Headquarters himself- quite the coward.

He doesn't do too well when he has no tame mods, does he?
 
I have a question for all parties: what is the current state of the case? Does anyone expect there to be any developments from what's on the table/in play now? Or is it basically a case of new evidence to be unearthed? Interested in people's thoughts on this question.
I have a good idea another fake sighting is on the cards.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

grizzlym Just one word about the poster ‘BrenR1958’. For 2 years she ran a sustained and vitriolic campaign against the McCanns, using as her avatar a photo of Dr Kate McCann overprinted with the words: ‘LYING BITCH’. She has now switched tack and now hates all the McCann-sceptics.
Perhaps you would care to show the people of this forum where I have denied any such thing... I think if you bothered to read my posts you would see that I have openly and honestly admitted to running a forum and living to regret it.

As much as it might please you Tony, to say I hate people, you again have misjudged me... I don't hate anybody.. hate clouds your judgement... hate blinds you to believe the worst. I don't hate you or any McCann sceptics, in fact I pity you... I pity you that you have to spend every waking moment sitting at a keyboard either trying to defend yourself from the hate and campaigns you have directed at the McCann family. I pity you having to spend every waking moment all bitter and twisted.

You were given every opportunity, known to mankind to stop your campaign against the McCanns, they bent over backwards to try to get you to stop without costing you money. They agreed to let you cease and desist but you were the one that could not hold your promises... promises you made not just to the McCanns but to a Court of Law. You are the one that is now standing before a Judge ....having to answer for your actions. You Tony are the person that is on social Media tell the world that the McCanns want to put you in jail.... again that is not true.

The draft order is here for everyone to read

http://regretsandramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/High-court-order.pdf

Court-Order-Draft.png


As I said Tony, I made a very bad judgement... the consequences of which I will have to live with until the day I die... as for hating people... nope not me.. I really do think you need to look into the mirror to see who the hater actually is.. and it is certainly not me.
 
Question: Could the children be prosecuted in Leicestershire for child neglect in Portugal?
Hardly a question from an academic, is it?

Very appropriate- very childish. Is that the best you can do? The problem you have is lack of a sense of the absurd.

You are once again reduced to personal abuse with no substantive argument. Situation normal then.
 
We know that Tony Bennett can't lie straight in a bed as he is so crooked- he tells lies for effect.

Beware if he swears on his mother's life!

He has repeatedly used visits to his mother and her infirmity as an excuse for failing to meet the McCann lawyers and court deadlines

This morning at 10.44am he said:

"Well, while the above was being written, I have in fact made a response. I was away all day yesterday on a 440-mile round trip (710km if you're reading this in Oz) taking my 92-year-old mother, who we placed in a care home in April, to Bournemouth so she could meet all her friends at the annual Soroptimists' Christmas bash. She made an impromptu speech at the end of it, I was amazed. She used to do a lot of fund-raising in the Soroptimists for various good causes. On return to her care home in Hastings, we 'phoned three people on my mobile. One, her childhood friend from Zagreb, now aged 94, to whom she spoke in Serbo-Croat, her second language. Then we spoke to our very good friends in Grundlsee, Austria, and she spoke in her native tongue, German. Then we 'phoned my daughter, and she spoke to her in English (her fourth language, French was her third). It all keeps her mind ticking over."

Strange, the Bournemouth Soroptomists web site says that their Christmas party was on Monday,

http://sigbi.org/bournemouth/club-diary-20089/

DECEMBER
17th December-Minimal Business with Christmas Party .

Bennett introduces his sainted mother as background mood music, and gets caught out lying once again.
He is so much a stranger to facts that he lies without conscience or shame.

Thank you Google and BB1
 
Oh another myth that is widely shouted about is the shutters... You will hear people screeching at the tops of their voices, "Those shutters can't be raised from the outside." "Those shutters make a terrible noise, people would have wandered what was happening and gone to see." "Gerry McCann is lying when he says he could open the shutters easily from the outside."

So, "Those shutters make a terrible noise, people would have wandered what was happening and gone to see." - well thinking about it, if you lived in an area where nobody had those shutters and then you heard them being raised at a certain time of night, then you might go and investigate. But, in Portugal the vast majority of people have these shutters, so the shutter noise of them being raised and lowered would be dismissed.. in fact you would become oblivious to it.

An analogy being - I had a dog that would bark in the garden all the time, my neighbours got used to him barking and they ignored him.. When he died back in July people realised something was wrong, but it took them a while to figure the noise they were missing was my dog.

Now onto, "Those shutters can't be raised from the outside." and "Gerry McCann is lying when he says he could open the shutters easily from the outside." Gerry said in his statement of the 10th May 2007



Back in February 2012, PeterMac - a poster on a forum where Tony Bennett posts, went to Praia da Luz with Pat Brown - Criminal profiler.

They went to apartment 5A and from the outside raised those shutters

http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/19/the-shutters/



Well as you can see, they don't make that much of a noise and yes they can be raised from the outside which proves Gerry McCann was not lying.

Strange tho that Gerry McCann's finger prints were never recovered from the shutters.
 
Strange tho that Gerry McCann's finger prints were never recovered from the shutters.
From the files, there was 3 inadequate fingerprints recovered...

04-PROCESSO 4 -967 to 972
WITH THANKS TO ALBYM
04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_967

04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_968

B - Pages 967-972 Processo vol 4.
At 11:00am on 4 May 2007 I, IT, assistant-specialist, began to examine the following location:
At apartment 5A, Ocean Club:

- Side of the patio door: One adequate print recovered but not matched to known persons.

- Outside of one patio door: Eight inadequate prints were recovered.- Outside of [the other] patio door: One inadequate print was recovered.- Outside of the external blinds to the children's bedroom: three inadequate prints were recovered.

Don't you agree, that Gerry McCanns could have been one of those three.. after all if the people were trying the blinds after Gerry McCann touched them, including the forensic officer who was taking the fingerprints without gloves, is it not feasible that his prints could be smudged which would have made them inadequate to lift etc?

a8.jpg
 
Very appropriate- very childish. Is that the best you can do? The problem you have is lack of a sense of the absurd.

You are once again reduced to personal abuse with no substantive argument. Situation normal then.
It is not personal abuse, nor is it childish. I am merely pointing out to other posters that you are not the academic you claim to be.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It is not personal abuse, nor is it childish. I am merely pointing out to other posters that you are not the academic you claim to be.

So, are academics not able to make the occasional error.

You are showing the level of (il)logic typical of someone who supports Tony Bennett's flights of fantasy.
 
From the files, there was 3 inadequate fingerprints recovered...

04-PROCESSO 4 -967 to 972
WITH THANKS TO ALBYM
04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_967

04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_968

B - Pages 967-972 Processo vol 4.
At 11:00am on 4 May 2007 I, IT, assistant-specialist, began to examine the following location:
At apartment 5A, Ocean Club:

- Side of the patio door: One adequate print recovered but not matched to known persons.

- Outside of one patio door: Eight inadequate prints were recovered.- Outside of [the other] patio door: One inadequate print was recovered.- Outside of the external blinds to the children's bedroom: three inadequate prints were recovered.

Don't you agree, that Gerry McCanns could have been one of those three.. after all if the people were trying the blinds after Gerry McCann touched them, including the forensic officer who was taking the fingerprints without gloves, is it not feasible that his prints could be smudged which would have made them inadequate to lift etc?

a8.jpg
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.
 
Wow Shubob appears...Now Shubob, care to ask Bennett why he lied about his father who Bennett says, took the German surrender in WW2 in Italy... when the records show, there was no Bennett there at all, the surrender actually took place a week before Bennett claimed it happened.

We all know Bennett's Zionist views and that he appeared in a crowd giving Nazi salutes denying the Holocaust ever happened. Bennett's mother has also been in a care home for over 4 years that I know of, so once again Bennett caught lying again.

Now what is interesting is the correspondence Bennett has had with Carter Ruck lately, yet has not told his masses on Havern's forum......okay I will then....he has offered to pay court costs and and money to McCanns if the case doesn't go ahead.

Where did you hear that?

I suspect that it will be turned down unless they can ensure that Mr Bennett stops his campaigning. The McCanns have been very tolerant. I do wonder whether post Mcalpine vs Twitter and after Tony has been incarcerated, CarterRuck might go for Internet sites and Twitter.
 
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.

If you look at those shutters, there are two quite obvious prints towards the right hand side and a lot of smudged areas on the left which look as if they could be prints on top of prints.

Prints might be smudged if someone is pushing and shoving at an item. Don't you agree?
 
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.

madeleine mccann fingerprint.png

Is that not a thumb without a glove on holding up the blind?

Whilst on the subject of forensics Thomas1965 would you care to comment on this part in italics? I have always wondered why the need for search and rescue dogs to enter the apartment at all.. surely as the pink blanket was used as a scent detector, it could have been used outside of the apartment... don't you think that the contamination of the crime scene is primarily because a) the police failed to secure the crime scene and b) because of their methods of investigation in a case where forensics are paramount.

http://mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/5A_FORENSIC_4_5_7.htm

Photos 21 to 23: Displays of the the bedroom with two single beds of the target apartment.

Then began the detailed observation of the apartment interior ending with the search and recovery of forensic trace material relevant to the present examination.
Initially the search began for latent shoe-prints it being verified that dozens existed on the floor, in the various rooms of the apartment, which invalidated the attempt of identifying those of the perpetrator. Also, innumerable tracks [footprints] that were taken to be canine in origin mixed with red- and white-coloured chemical products, as used to see fingerprints, and an enormous quantity of hairs probably of animal (dog) origin that made it difficult to find possible traces, especially in the bedroom of two single beds and two children's cots from
where the minor disappeared, and next to the aluminium window/door leading from inside the living room to the exterior area behind the apartment.
 
Also the first search dogs on the scene picked up a scent from the shutters to the car park, where the scent stopped in a car parking bay....now with the dog picking up Madeleine's scent then it stops in a car park, where it would be appropriate to say a car was parked. Now why would it stop in a car park bay?? Err took away in a car
 
Just like the English police then, who incidentally reached the same conclusions as their Portuguese counterparts.


Do you mean the oh so random dog handler who just spoke to a random stranger on a train? Or maybe ex Police Officers who were misquoted by the Anti brigade?

Or maybe the ones in your own head
 
Hullo Bren, I hope you're well. I know you had some interest in the case - can I ask you what are you views on the Casey Anthony case? Do you believe what her defence team said at her trial?
 
Just like the English police then, who incidentally reached the same conclusions as their Portuguese counterparts.

Cite please for this being a conclusion rather than one line of enquiry. Please refer to an independent source rather than a forum myth so that we know that you are not lying as Tony Bennett does so often (and about his sainted mother too.)
 
Here is another shot of the infamous shutter....where the woman is dusting where her thumb and hand were


dustin10.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top