Academic? pmsl, shall I post the question you asked Tony back in 2010?
Do please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Academic? pmsl, shall I post the question you asked Tony back in 2010?
Is that you ShuBob?Academic? pmsl, shall I post the question you asked Tony back in 2010?
I have a good idea another fake sighting is on the cards.I have a question for all parties: what is the current state of the case? Does anyone expect there to be any developments from what's on the table/in play now? Or is it basically a case of new evidence to be unearthed? Interested in people's thoughts on this question.
Perhaps you would care to show the people of this forum where I have denied any such thing... I think if you bothered to read my posts you would see that I have openly and honestly admitted to running a forum and living to regret it.grizzlym Just one word about the poster ‘BrenR1958’. For 2 years she ran a sustained and vitriolic campaign against the McCanns, using as her avatar a photo of Dr Kate McCann overprinted with the words: ‘LYING BITCH’. She has now switched tack and now hates all the McCann-sceptics.
Question: Could the children be prosecuted in Leicestershire for child neglect in Portugal?Do please.
Question: Could the children be prosecuted in Leicestershire for child neglect in Portugal?
Hardly a question from an academic, is it?
Oh another myth that is widely shouted about is the shutters... You will hear people screeching at the tops of their voices, "Those shutters can't be raised from the outside." "Those shutters make a terrible noise, people would have wandered what was happening and gone to see." "Gerry McCann is lying when he says he could open the shutters easily from the outside."
So, "Those shutters make a terrible noise, people would have wandered what was happening and gone to see." - well thinking about it, if you lived in an area where nobody had those shutters and then you heard them being raised at a certain time of night, then you might go and investigate. But, in Portugal the vast majority of people have these shutters, so the shutter noise of them being raised and lowered would be dismissed.. in fact you would become oblivious to it.
An analogy being - I had a dog that would bark in the garden all the time, my neighbours got used to him barking and they ignored him.. When he died back in July people realised something was wrong, but it took them a while to figure the noise they were missing was my dog.
Now onto, "Those shutters can't be raised from the outside." and "Gerry McCann is lying when he says he could open the shutters easily from the outside." Gerry said in his statement of the 10th May 2007
Back in February 2012, PeterMac - a poster on a forum where Tony Bennett posts, went to Praia da Luz with Pat Brown - Criminal profiler.
They went to apartment 5A and from the outside raised those shutters
http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/19/the-shutters/
Well as you can see, they don't make that much of a noise and yes they can be raised from the outside which proves Gerry McCann was not lying.
Strange tho that Gerry McCann's finger prints were never recovered from the shutters.
From the files, there was 3 inadequate fingerprints recovered...Strange tho that Gerry McCann's finger prints were never recovered from the shutters.
It is not personal abuse, nor is it childish. I am merely pointing out to other posters that you are not the academic you claim to be.Very appropriate- very childish. Is that the best you can do? The problem you have is lack of a sense of the absurd.
You are once again reduced to personal abuse with no substantive argument. Situation normal then.
It is not personal abuse, nor is it childish. I am merely pointing out to other posters that you are not the academic you claim to be.
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.From the files, there was 3 inadequate fingerprints recovered...
04-PROCESSO 4 -967 to 972
WITH THANKS TO ALBYM
04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_967
04_VOLUME_IVa_Page_968
B - Pages 967-972 Processo vol 4.
At 11:00am on 4 May 2007 I, IT, assistant-specialist, began to examine the following location:
At apartment 5A, Ocean Club:
- Side of the patio door: One adequate print recovered but not matched to known persons.
- Outside of one patio door: Eight inadequate prints were recovered.- Outside of [the other] patio door: One inadequate print was recovered.- Outside of the external blinds to the children's bedroom: three inadequate prints were recovered.
Don't you agree, that Gerry McCanns could have been one of those three.. after all if the people were trying the blinds after Gerry McCann touched them, including the forensic officer who was taking the fingerprints without gloves, is it not feasible that his prints could be smudged which would have made them inadequate to lift etc?
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.
Wow Shubob appears...Now Shubob, care to ask Bennett why he lied about his father who Bennett says, took the German surrender in WW2 in Italy... when the records show, there was no Bennett there at all, the surrender actually took place a week before Bennett claimed it happened.
We all know Bennett's Zionist views and that he appeared in a crowd giving Nazi salutes denying the Holocaust ever happened. Bennett's mother has also been in a care home for over 4 years that I know of, so once again Bennett caught lying again.
Now what is interesting is the correspondence Bennett has had with Carter Ruck lately, yet has not told his masses on Havern's forum......okay I will then....he has offered to pay court costs and and money to McCanns if the case doesn't go ahead.
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.
I doubt the forensic guy would have touched the shutters.
Photos 21 to 23: Displays of the the bedroom with two single beds of the target apartment.
Then began the detailed observation of the apartment interior ending with the search and recovery of forensic trace material relevant to the present examination.
Initially the search began for latent shoe-prints it being verified that dozens existed on the floor, in the various rooms of the apartment, which invalidated the attempt of identifying those of the perpetrator. Also, innumerable tracks [footprints] that were taken to be canine in origin mixed with red- and white-coloured chemical products, as used to see fingerprints, and an enormous quantity of hairs probably of animal (dog) origin that made it difficult to find possible traces, especially in the bedroom of two single beds and two children's cots from where the minor disappeared, and next to the aluminium window/door leading from inside the living room to the exterior area behind the apartment.
Just like the English police then, who incidentally reached the same conclusions as their Portuguese counterparts.Or even a woman.. I do because the Portuguese Police are so incompetent
Just like the English police then, who incidentally reached the same conclusions as their Portuguese counterparts.
Just like the English police then, who incidentally reached the same conclusions as their Portuguese counterparts.