Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
My favourite was Harvey's kick to Black that would of put us 4 goals up, yet wasn't paid cause it was "touched".
Guys just got home and saw the last few seconds of the game on replay. great mark by nic nat. Was the contentious free kick the selwood one. if so what was it for. I've had a quick look at the tape. black marks its kicks it before he needs to the ball goes over the pack the WC player braces for impact. Slowed it right down it is not in the back nor high. Did the North guy (Adams?) hold him too long. I watch it with the sound down so I am a bit unclear on what the fuss is about.
I suspect the contact might be from the fact the tacklers high arm came loose as they fell and were on the floor and then he got him again once he reached for the ball whilst on the ground. It's hard to tell without another angle.McGuire, Brereton and Maclure are currently watching the slo mo replay and have their eyes rolling around in their heads.
They can't believe what they are seeing.
Umpire confirmed this was not the free kick, it was rightly called play on.Why does the Selwood family always look like they are sitting in an armchair when they are being tackled? Is this where the phrase "armchair ride from the umps" comes from?
From khaleesi:
It was paid as a high.
No doubt Adam Selwood played for it - but I don't think there's any doubt that under the rules that this is a free.
Was going for north but that decision was worth it to see the hissy fit from Scott.
The two twins are like children, always acting like everything is against them. I like that they are outspoken but every other coach keeps their cool (relatively) when the inevitable bad calls go against them.
Its petulant, pathetic, childish and a bad image for kids.
You all know what you saw.
It's getting beyond farcical.
If we're not careful we will lose our game.
I was a bit doubtful when I saw it live. But thats a pretty clear high. Well picked up by the ump.From khaleesi:
It was paid as a high.
No doubt Adam Selwood played for it - but I don't think there's any doubt that under the rules that this is a free.
Karma for Thomas diving?
Karma for Thomas diving?
etcKarma for Thomas diving?
You all know what you saw.
It's getting beyond farcical.
If we're not careful we will lose our game.
Could it be this?Umpire confirmed this was not the free kick, it was rightly called play on.
The free kick was paid for Andrew Swallows knee missing Selwoods head by a foot when he was on the ground. Wow.
I suspect the contact might be from the fact the tacklers high arm came loose as they fell and were on the floor and then he got him again once he reached for the ball whilst on the ground. It's hard to tell without another angle.
What was it North fans? "Im loving the tears Port".
Ditto
if north wanna make the 8 then they lost a lot.I'm just over being angry about losing by a kick / after siren. I'm not even that upset by this. WCE can have their win and whatever solace it brings other people, so be it.
It's a nothing season for both teams now. Neither club will do anything. The 4 points are almost worthless
Thinking clearly; there are a lot of stupid posts on this thread. Some really embarrassing.
Lindsay does flop around for frees, but every team has their actors. I dont like it either.
This is the only one I'm really pissed about. The Shuey and Selwood frees were shit but get paid most weeks so you just have to take them as they come. The non-mark to Black was blatantly incorrect by every measure.One of the worst decisions was Black marking 30 metres out and it being called touched. The funny thing is the umpires had the whistle away for the first 3 quarters but had to influence the game in the last quarter. Inconsistent maggots drop them all to the vfl.
My favourite was Harvey's kick to Black that would of put us 4 goals up, yet wasn't paid cause it was "touched".