- Jun 1, 2010
- 10,163
- 8,186
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
HF: Billings, Riewoldt, Membrey
F: Hickey, Bruce, Lonie
I approve.
F: Hickey, Bruce, Lonie
I approve.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HF: Billings, Riewoldt, Membrey
F: Hickey, Bruce, Lonie
I approve.
Im a huge Hickey fan but i probably wouldnt bring him in on reputation alone.. I wouldnt be playing him and Longer in the same team now that Bruce has improved so much. Longer needs more senior experience and I'd like to see Hickey really push for selection with strong VFL form..
Billings in for ? ... Thats it.
Reputation alone? I guess his past AFL form counts for nothing.
Strong VFL form? Like the game he played the other day?
Hickey was nearly best on last weekend so don't know what else he could've done.No Periphery , his past doesnt count for nothing. But Longers already in the team and needs the runs. Do you think his VFL form was really good?
The players I worry about are there key young players in Prestia, Swallow, Bennell and Lynch.
If we spend to much time focusing on Ablett, Prestia & Swallow can take control in the midfield.
- Shutting down Ablett is a first priority, then 2nd for me is Prestia. His a player you have to make accountable. Maybe a player like Savage can give him a run.
- Lynch kick 4.2 against us last time, think if he gets onto a few, he'll be hard to stop. Saying that with Fisher back, Dempster not carrying as much load and savage taking a step up I think the backline can limit the delivery to him. Delaney will have his work cutout if not.
- Bennell is a player that can dominate on his good day. Need to get stuck into him, as when he makes mistakes under pressure he gets frustrated and lazy. Someone like a Geary? But he may be to short. Someone that can match him with height and pace?
If we can cut down on there impact on the game, I believe we are on track to give them a run.
I think Weller goes straight to Ablett if he plays. He'll test out that shoulder at every chance.
Same problem at GWS though.
If Hickey wants to take his spot, surely that's taking it a bit far...No Periphery , his past doesnt count for nothing. But Longers already in the team and needs the runs. Do you think his VFL form was really good?
Yeah they will be. My biggest concern, apart from Ablett getting 40 and kicking 4, is the dewy ground. If it's not torrential rain in SE Qld, it's the bloody dew that settles in every evening making the ball like a cake of soap. If we are lamenting Shenton's disposal under the roof at Docklands, God help him (us) on Saturday night.They will be fired up, everyone's been into them media wise.
Unfortunately not.I think Tom Lynch is also still suspended this week?
It's not a good sign when your defensive coach is calling the game for national television and says words to the effect of "not good enough" and "needs to be better".Jesus how obsessed with bagging Shenton is this place. Of all the players yesterday he was not the difference or even in the bottom 10 players probably. Steven had as many bad kicks. It seems to be like some kind of need to single someone out.
He played on the forward flank quite a bit for Sandringham but I'm not sure where he honed his craft as a junior. I don't think he has the skills to make it as a forward and there's too much competition for him to be considered. But hey I didn't think Bruce would be much of a forward so what do I know?It's not a good sign when your defensive coach is calling the game for national television and says words to the effect of "not good enough" and "needs to be better".
Having pointed that out, I thought his endeavour was excellent. Am I mistaken when I say that Shenton is a forward who transitioned to the backline in order to seek more opportunity? I am just wondering whether a shift back forward might offer some benefits.
He played on the forward flank quite a bit for Sandringham but I'm not sure where he honed his craft as a junior. I don't think he has the skills to make it as a forward and there's too much competition for him to be considered. But hey I didn't think Bruce would be much of a forward so what do I know?
It's not a good sign when your defensive coach is calling the game for national television and says words to the effect of "not good enough" and "needs to be better".
Having pointed that out, I thought his endeavour was excellent. Am I mistaken when I say that Shenton is a forward who transitioned to the backline in order to seek more opportunity? I am just wondering whether a shift back forward might offer some benefits.
He didn't say on national TV that Shenton wasn't good enough for AFL! He said his play when he stuffed one of those things up wasn't good enough, which is completely true.
I said earlier in the year that I thought Shents was about 12th in line for a spot in our backline and I still see him as just someone who is plugging a gap until the likes of Gilbert (hopefully), Webster and Wright are ready to return and for when Roberton is back to peak form and fitness. Then you have others like Murdoch, Acres and McKenzie who I see as hopefully better long term options. At a couple of inches taller and with better footskills I much prefer Roberton as a long term option back there to Shents, especially if we are going to have Delaney and Geary playing there long term, which gives us just about enough poor kicking for one backline, especially if Gilbo or even Wright are there as well.
Have I not shown him respect because I said I see him as 12th in line for a spot in our backline and that I prefer others long term? I agree that there is a line that is poor form to cross and don't ever abuse anyone from our team at the footy or hopefully on here, but this is a discussion forum, not a cheerleading forum, where we just talk about the positives. Whether we like it or not it's a jungle out there and the strong will survive, as has always been the case.