- Sep 22, 2008
- 25,524
- 34,634
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #276
Which really isn't trueReally? All reports state the offer was less than what the dogs are paying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Which really isn't trueReally? All reports state the offer was less than what the dogs are paying
How so. Any links that say otherwise besides your gut feeling or ego of dogs fans?Which really isn't true
They don't like being questioned on that.
No links but a very reliable poster on the dogs board, of course you don't have to believe that but I'm confident it's true considering where it came from and I have absolutely no doubt he's not leaving for a paycutHow so. Any links that say otherwise besides your gut feeling or ego of dogs fans?
So bf dogs supporter. Hmmm ill stick with the information we have.No links but a very reliable poster on the dogs board, of course you don't have to believe that but I'm confident it's true considering where it came from and I have absolutely no doubt he's not leaving for a paycut
No links but a very reliable poster on the dogs board, of course you don't have to believe that but I'm confident it's true considering where it came from and I have absolutely no doubt he's not leaving for a paycut
So bf dogs supporter. Hmmm ill stick with the information we have.
Fair nuffI can believe both, by some very simple Chinese whispers.
GWS : "Griffen will cost us 400k in cap room on a four year deal"
Dogs : "Griffen will be paid 700k a year for the four years"
Actual : Griffen paid $2.8m over 4. $1.2m prepaid by Dogs in year 1 on Dogs cap, in exchange for GWS pick 4 and 7. Rest of payments are on GWS cap, putting all payments on a salary cap somewhere.
Despite sounding very different, both stories are true
Ok. No worriesOk well offer up 4 and 7 or Boyd, otherwise we're not paying for you to steal our captain.
Ok well offer up 4 and 7 or Boyd, otherwise we're not paying for you to steal our captain.
Well... Yes?'Steal' your captain? LOL
Well... Yes?
By "coaching candidates" you mean anyone desperate enough to destroy his future.So. Any bites on the attempts to find Griffen another exit ?
Or are you expecting the Dogs are going to be explaining to coaching candidates that you have no clue what you're going to do with Ryan Griffen ?
Bit hard to shop the campaigner around when he's literally in hiding and Uncontactable, probably what GWS have instructed him to do.So. Any bites on the attempts to find Griffen another exit ?
Or are you expecting the Dogs are going to be explaining to coaching candidates that you have no clue what you're going to do with Ryan Griffen ?
By "coaching candidates" you mean anyone desperate enough to destroy his future.
Bit hard to shop the campaigner around when he's literally in hiding and Uncontactable, probably what GWS have instructed him to do.
I still dont understand why the Dogs didnt back their coach.
We did. He resigned.
There wasn't a player revolt. Macca had lost the players.
we choose the wrong captain last year.
You just really don't understand trade values it seems, simple as that. Saying "7 is overs for Griffen" is a dumb comment that shows you just don't have a lot of knowledge in this area. Everyone has their opinion of course, but you should tone it down a bit, you're making yourself look pretty stupid continually saying things like that.
By "coaching candidates" you mean anyone desperate enough to destroy his future.